Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.
de Vlieger, Johannes C N; Luiting, Willem H; Lockyer, Jessica; Meyer, Peter; Fleer, Joke; Sanderman, Robbert; Wietasch, J K Götz.
Afiliação
  • de Vlieger JCN; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9937 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands. j.c.n.de.vlieger@umcg.nl.
  • Luiting WH; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9937 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Lockyer J; Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Meyer P; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9937 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Fleer J; Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9937 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Sanderman R; Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9937 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Wietasch JKG; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9937 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 243, 2022 08 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35915438
BACKGROUND: The 15-item Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale is strongly recommended as a standard patient-reported outcome measure assessing the quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia in the postoperative period. This study aimed to validate the Dutch translation of the questionnaire (QoR-15NL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, prospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted. Patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia completed the QoR-15NL (preoperatively (t1) and twice postoperatively (t2 and t3)) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for general recovery at t2. A psychometric evaluation was performed to assess the QoR-15NL's validity, reliability, responsiveness, reproducibility and feasibility. RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven patients agreed to participate (recruitment rate 94%), and 165 patients were included (completion rate 78%). The QoR-15NL score correlated with the VAS for general recovery (rs = 0.59). Construct validity was further demonstrated by confirmation of expected negative associations between the QoR-15NL and duration of surgery (rs = -0.25), duration of Post Anesthesia Care Unit stay (rs = -0.31), and duration of hospital stay (rs = -0.27). The QoR-15NL score decreased significantly according to the extent of surgery. Cronbach's alpha was 0.87, split-half reliability was 0.8, and the test-retest intra-class coefficient was 0.93. No significant floor- or ceiling effect was observed. CONCLUSION: The QoR-15NL scale is a valid, easy-to-use, and reliable outcome assessment tool with high responsiveness for patient-reported quality of recovery after surgery and general anesthesia in the Dutch-speaking population. The QoR-15NL's measurement properties are comparable to the original questionnaire and other translated versions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not applicable.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Período de Recuperação da Anestesia / Anestesia Geral Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Período de Recuperação da Anestesia / Anestesia Geral Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article