Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterizing incidental mass lesions in abdominal dual-energy CT compared to conventional contrast-enhanced CT.
Xu, Jack Junchi; Ulriksen, Peter Sommer; Bjerrum, Camilla Wium; Achiam, Michael Patrick; Resch, Timothy Andrew; Lönn, Lars; Lindskov Hansen, Kristoffer.
Afiliação
  • Xu JJ; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 53146Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Ulriksen PS; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Bjerrum CW; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 53146Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Achiam MP; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 53146Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Resch TA; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lönn L; Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 53146Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lindskov Hansen K; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Radiol ; 64(3): 945-950, 2023 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35918808
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Incidental findings are common in abdominal computed tomography (CT) and often warrant further investigations with economic implications as well as implications for patients.

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the potential of dual-energy CT (DECT) in the identification and/or characterization of abdominal incidental mass lesions compared to conventional contrast-enhanced CT. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

This retrospective study from a major tertiary hospital included 96 patients, who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT. Incidental lesions in adrenals, kidneys, liver, and pancreas were evaluated by two board-certified abdominal radiologists. Observer 1 only had access to standard CT reconstructions, while observer 2 had access to standard CT as well as DECT reconstructions. Disagreements were resolved by consensus review and used as a reference for observers using McNemar's test.

RESULTS:

Observers 1 and 2 identified a total of 40 and 34 findings, respectively. Furthermore, observer 1 registered 13 lesions requiring follow-up, of which seven (two renal and five adrenal lesions) were resolved following consensus review using DECT (P = 0.008). The inter-observer agreement was near perfect (κ = 0.82).

CONCLUSION:

DECT has the potential to improve the immediate characterization of incidental findings when compared to conventional CT for abdominal imaging.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imagem Radiográfica a Partir de Emissão de Duplo Fóton Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imagem Radiográfica a Partir de Emissão de Duplo Fóton Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article