Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of brain nicotine uptake from electronic cigarettes and combustible cigarettes.
Zuo, Yantao; Mukhin, Alexey G; Berg, Hannah; Morgan, Janiece D; Mintz, Akiva; Rose, Jed E; Solingapuram Sai, Kiran Kumar.
Afiliação
  • Zuo Y; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
  • Mukhin AG; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. a.mukhin@duke.edu.
  • Berg H; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
  • Morgan JD; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
  • Mintz A; Department of Radiology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
  • Rose JE; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
  • Solingapuram Sai KK; Department of Radiology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 47(11): 1939-1944, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35962133
ABSTRACT
Brain accumulation rate and magnitude are critical for the acute reinforcing effects of nicotine. Despite electronic cigarettes' (E-cigs) appeal as substitutes for traditional combustible cigarettes (C-cigs), brain nicotine accumulation (BNA) from E-cigs has not been compared with that from C-cigs using a within-subjects design. BNA was directly assessed with 16 adult dual users (10 females) of E-cigs (e-liquid pH 9.4) and C-cigs, using 11C-nicotine and positron emission tomography (PET). Participants went through two 15-min head scanning sessions during which they inhaled a single puff of E-cig vapor or C-cig smoke containing 11C-nicotine in a randomized order. A full-body scan was also conducted at each session to measure total absorbed dose of 11C-nicotine. Mean maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under curve of BNA were 22.1% and 22.7% lower, respectively, following E-cig compared with C-cig inhalation. Meanwhile, T1/2 was 2.7 times longer following inhalation of E-cig vapor relative to C-cig smoke (all ps < 0.005). Whole-body imaging indicated greater nicotine retention in the respiratory tract from vapor versus smoke inhalation (p < 0.0001). Following vapor inhalation, nicotine retention in the respiratory tract was correlated with Cmax values of BNA (rs = -0.59, p < 0.02). Our results confirm that E-cigs with alkaline pH e-liquid can deliver nicotine rapidly to the brain, albeit less efficiently than C-cigs partly due to greater airway retention of nicotine. Since brain nicotine uptake mediates reinforcement, these results help elucidate actions of E-cigs in terms of abuse liability and effectiveness in substituting for combustible cigarettes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos do Tabaco / Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuropsychopharmacology Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos do Tabaco / Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuropsychopharmacology Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article