Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Midwives' interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women: a scoping review.
Souto, Sandra Patrícia Arantes do; Silva, Rosa Carla Gomes da; Prata, Ana Paula; Guerra, Maria João; Couto, Cristina; Albuquerque, Rosemeire Sartori de.
Afiliação
  • Souto SPAD; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health: Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.
  • Silva RCGD; Maternity unit, Hospital Center Póvoa de Varzim/Vila do Conde, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal.
  • Prata AP; Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC).
  • Guerra MJ; Portugal Centre for Evidence Based Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Nursing School of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Couto C; CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Nursing School of Porto (ESEP), Porto, Portugal.
  • Albuquerque RS; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health: Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.
JBI Evid Synth ; 20(12): 2867-2935, 2022 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976033
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to map and analyze midwives' interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women. INTRODUCTION: Fear of childbirth is a phenomenon negatively affecting women's health and well-being before and during pregnancy. Over the past few decades, there has been growing research interest in interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women. One of the challenges in midwifery care is to provide an appropriate model of care for pregnant women with fear of childbirth. Further research efforts are needed to identify midwives' interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women and to examine their characteristics. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This scoping review considered studies that included midwives' interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women. Specifically, interventions were led and/or implemented by midwives during the antenatal period, and integrating all possible midwifery practice settings. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies were included. This review also considered systematic reviews, text and opinion papers, and conference abstracts. METHODS: The JBI methodology for conducting scoping reviews was used. Published and unpublished literature in English, Portuguese, and Spanish from January 1981 to October 2020 was included. MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL Complete, APA PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, SciELO, MedicLatina, Academic Search Complete, ERIC, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. Searches for gray literature were also undertaken on the Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, British Library EThOS, OvidSP Resource Center, Banco de Teses da CAPES, and OpenGrey. A three-step search strategy was followed, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist was used. Two independent reviewers extracted the data using a data extraction tool developed specifically for this scoping review. RESULTS: A total of 3704 articles were identified and screened, of which 34 articles were included. The majority of studies had been published in the past 10 years (88%) in Scandinavian countries or Australia (79%). Several midwives' antenatal interventions were found, such as midwife-led team models of care. Midwives played a facilitator role that varied across the included studies. In 20 studies (59%), midwives led and implemented the interventions alone ( n   =  13; 38%) or with the participation of other health professionals ( n   =  7; 21%). In the remaining 14 studies (41%), midwives were part of a multidisciplinary team that included different health professionals (mainly obstetricians and psychologists) who had been involved in delivering interventions alongside midwives or with minor participation from midwives. Counseling ( n   =  12; 35%) and psychoeducation ( n   =  8; 24%) were the most common midwife interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives working across their full scope of practice play a pivotal role in reducing fear of childbirth, which may explain the variety of midwives' antenatal interventions. Reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women and promoting normal childbirth as a positive experience are key features of midwives' interventions, which should include women's empowerment measures. Evidence-based midwife-led intervention programs for pregnant women with fear of childbirth should be designed and tested to improve clinical practice as well as women's reproductive outcomes and perinatal experiences.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 5_ODS3_mortalidade_materna Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tocologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: JBI Evid Synth Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 5_ODS3_mortalidade_materna Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tocologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: JBI Evid Synth Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article