Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychosocial and Ethical Behaviors and Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in the Clinical Setting of Living Kidney Donors: A Qualitative Study.
Arai, Nana; Takimoto, Yoshiyuki; Nakazawa, Eisuke; Ishimura, Takeshi; Yokoyama, Naoki; Hara, Mayumi; Ozeki-Hayashi, Reina; Akabayashi, Akira.
Afiliação
  • Arai N; Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Takimoto Y; Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: takimoto@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
  • Nakazawa E; Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ishimura T; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
  • Yokoyama N; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
  • Hara M; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
  • Ozeki-Hayashi R; Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Akabayashi A; Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Transplant Proc ; 54(7): 1750-1758, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35985877
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are several psychosocial and ethical issues surrounding the decision making of living kidney transplant donors. This study aimed to determine what health care professionals (HPs) consider in their clinical practice and their attitudes toward donors' decision-making processes.

METHODS:

Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 HPs. A thematic analysis was performed to categorize the thematic elements of the transcripts. All procedures were approved by the relevant review board and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS:

Six main categories-maintaining family relationships, improving donor understanding, supporting voluntary decision making, setting the environment for the examination, having different attitudes toward the donor's intentions, and resisting confirmation of intent-were identified. The HPs provided diverse considerations to respect the donors' autonomy.

CONCLUSION:

In clinical practice, there is a lack of practical methods to confirm living donors' levels of understanding and spontaneity, suggesting that these methods need to be established. Factors related to family functioning may reflect the unique culture of Japan, and this may be indicative of the need to consider treatment based on cultural values.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Doadores Vivos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Doadores Vivos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article