Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An experimental study of flexural strength and hardness of zirconia and their relation to crown failure loads.
Alghazzawi, Tariq F; Janowski, Gregg M; Eberhardt, Alan W.
Afiliação
  • Alghazzawi TF; Associate Professor, Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, Taibah University, Madina, Saudi Arabia; Fullbright Scholar, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA. Electronic address: drtariq05@gmail.com.
  • Janowski GM; Professor, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.
  • Eberhardt AW; Professor and Associate Chair, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.
J Prosthet Dent ; 2022 Aug 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35995603
ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF

PROBLEM:

Dental zirconia is often marketed and selected for restorative use based upon the biaxial flexural strength of prefabricated specimens (disks) without considering other mechanical and physical properties.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this in vitro study was to test whether 4-point flexural strength, biaxial flexural strength, and/or hardness may correlate with failure loads for crowns made of different zirconia materials. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Three brands of zirconia (BruxZir, Cercon, and Katana) were used to fabricate anatomically contoured crowns, rectangular bars, and circular disks. The sample size was n=15 specimens per zirconia brand and specimen shape. The bars were tested for 4-point flexural strength by using the 4-point bending (4PB) test and Vickers hardness (VH), while the disks were tested for biaxial flexural strength by using a piston-on-3 ball (POB) test. Crowns were attached to resin abutments and compressed with a steel spherical indenter through a polyethylene sheet to assess the failure loads by using the "crunch the crown" (CTC) test. One-way ANOVA (α=.05) was used to test for statistically significant differences between groups, and Weibull analysis was used to assess the variability of the measured flexural strengths, failure load, and hardness.

RESULTS:

Statistical differences (P<.001) were found in comparing Cercon, BruxZir, and Katana ([4260 N=4186 N]>3195 N, respectively) with the CTC test and (396 MPa>[281 MPa=275 MPa], respectively) the 4PB test. No statistical differences (P=.084) were found among the zirconia brands (Cercon [384 MPa]=Bruxzir [359 MPa]=Katana [416 MPa]) for the POB test. No significant correlations (P>.05) were found between the 4PB, POB, or VH tests and the corresponding CTC test. The Weibull modulus varied for the different specimen geometries.

CONCLUSIONS:

The piston-on-3 ball, 4-point bending, and Vickers hardness test results were not correlated with the corresponding crunch-the-crown test.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article