Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image quality and subject experience of quiet T1-weighted 7-T brain imaging using a silent gradient coil.
Jacobs, Sarah M; Versteeg, Edwin; van der Kolk, Anja G; Visser, Leonie N C; Oliveira, Ícaro A F; van Maren, Emiel; Klomp, Dennis W J; Siero, Jeroen C W.
Afiliação
  • Jacobs SM; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. s.m.jacobs@umctrecht.nl.
  • Versteeg E; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. e.versteeg-5@umcutrecht.nl.
  • van der Kolk AG; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Visser LNC; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Oliveira ÍAF; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Maren E; Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Klomp DWJ; Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Siero JCW; Experimental and Applied Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eur Radiol Exp ; 6(1): 36, 2022 08 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36042139
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Acoustic noise in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) negatively impacts patients. We assessed a silent gradient coil switched at 20 kHz combined with a T1-weighted magnetisation prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence at 7 T.

METHODS:

Five healthy subjects (21-29 years; three females) without previous 7-T MRI experience underwent both a quiet MPRAGE (Q-MPRAGE) and conventional MPRAGE (C-MPRAGE) sequence twice. Image quality was assessed quantitatively, and qualitatively by two neuroradiologists. Sound level was measured objectively and rated subjectively on a 0 to 10 scale by all subjects immediately following each sequence and after the whole examination (delayed). All subjects also reported comfort level, overall experience and willingness to undergo the sequence again.

RESULTS:

Compared to C-MPRAGE, Q-MPRAGE showed higher signal-to-noise ratio (10%; p = 0.012) and lower contrast-to-noise ratio (20%; p < 0.001) as well as acceptable to good image quality. Q-MPRAGE produced 27 dB lower sound level (76 versus 103 dB). Subjects reported lower sound level for Q-MPRAGE both immediate (4.4 ± 1.4 versus 6.4 ± 1.3; p = 0.007) and delayed (4.6 ± 1.4 versus 6.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.005), while they rated comfort level (7.4 ± 1.0 versus 6.1 ± 1.7; p = 0.016) and overall experience (7.6 ± 1.0 versus 6.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.005) higher. Willingness to undergo the sequence again was also higher, however not significantly (8.1 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.3; p = 0.066).

CONCLUSION:

Q-MPRAGE using a silent gradient coil reduced sound level by 27 dB compared to C-MPRAGE at 7 T while featuring acceptable-to-good image quality and a quieter and more pleasant subject experience.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Exp Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Exp Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article