Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Framework for Aquatic Invasive Species Surveillance Site Selection and Prioritization in the US waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes.
Tucker, Andrew J; Chadderton, W Lindsay; Annis, Gust; Davidson, Alisha D; Bossenbroek, Jon; Hensler, Stephen; Hoff, Michael; Hoffman, Joel; Jensen, Erika; Kashian, Donna; LeSage, Sarah; Strakosh, Timothy.
Afiliação
  • Tucker AJ; The Nature Conservancy, 721 Flanner Hall, University of Notre Dame, IN, 46556.
  • Chadderton WL; The Nature Conservancy, 721 Flanner Hall, University of Notre Dame, IN, 46556.
  • Annis G; The Nature Conservancy, 101 E. Cesar Chavez Ave, Lansing, MI 48906.
  • Davidson AD; Wayne State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Detroit, MI 48202.
  • Bossenbroek J; University of Toledo, Department of Environmental Sciences, Toledo, OH 43606.
  • Hensler S; US Fish & Wildlife Service, Waterford, MI 48327.
  • Hoff M; Cerulean Center, Traverse City, MI 49684.
  • Hoffman J; US Fish & Wildlife Service, Bloomington, MN 55437 (Retired).
  • Jensen E; US Environmental Protection Agency, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804.
  • Kashian D; Great Lakes Commission, Ann Arbor, MI 48108.
  • LeSage S; Wayne State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Detroit, MI 48202.
  • Strakosh T; Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, Lansing, MI 48909.
Manag Biol Invasion ; 11(3): 607-632, 2020 Jul 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36072892
ABSTRACT
Risk-based prioritization for early detection monitoring is of utmost importance to prevent and mitigate invasive species impacts. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, a binational commitment between the United States and Canada to restore and protect the waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes, identifies aquatic invasive species (AIS) as one of ten priority issues (annexes) that must be addressed to ensure the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Great Lakes. The Agreement calls out the need for a comprehensive strategy for detecting and tracking new and potentially invasive species. Yet, with a surface water area of 95, 000 square miles (246, 049 square km) and shoreline length of 10, 210 miles (16, 431 km), the Great Lakes represent a daunting challenge for prioritizing where AIS surveillance activities should occur. Our goal was to develop a spatially-explicit and quantitative approach for identifying the highest risk sites for AIS introduction into the US waters of the Great Lakes based on the cumulative risk of new introductions (including range expansions) from a range of pathways and associated taxa. We estimate "invasion risk" scores for nearly 6,000 sites (9 km x 9 km) across the Great Lakes basin using proxy measures for propagule pressure weighted by the proportion of taxa associated with each proxy variable. Proxy variables include human population, number of ship visits, marina size, number of ponds, and number of natural or artificial aquatic connections. In total, we identify more than 1,800 sites with invasion risk scores >0. A small subset of these 1,800+ sites accounts for a majority of predicted propagule pressure and are therefore logical targets for future surveillance and AIS prevention efforts. Many of the highest risk sites are located in western Lake Erie, southern Lake Michigan, and the St. Clair-Detroit River System.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Manag Biol Invasion Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Manag Biol Invasion Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article