Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: updates to a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.
Mease, Philip J; McInnes, Iain B; Tam, Lai-Shan; Rajalingam, Raji; Peterson, Steve; Hassan, Fareen; Chakravarty, Soumya D; Contré, Christine; Armstrong, Alison; Boehncke, Wolf-Henning; Ritchlin, Christopher.
Afiliação
  • Mease PJ; Rheumatology Research, Swedish Medical Center/Providence St Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • McInnes IB; Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Tam LS; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and The Prince of Wales Hospital, Sha Tin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
  • Rajalingam R; EVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
  • Peterson S; Janssen Global Services, Horsham, PA, USA.
  • Hassan F; Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe, UK.
  • Chakravarty SD; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
  • Contré C; Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Armstrong A; Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson, Issy-les-Moulneaux, France.
  • Boehncke WH; EVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ritchlin C; Division of Dermatology and Venereology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(4): 1417-1425, 2023 04 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36102818
OBJECTIVE: The IL-23 p19-subunit inhibitor guselkumab has been previously compared with other targeted therapies for PsA through network meta-analysis (NMA). The objective of this NMA update was to include new guselkumab COSMOS trial data, and two key comparators: the IL-23 inhibitor risankizumab and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials up to February 2021. A hand-search identified newer agents up to July 2021. Bayesian NMAs were performed to compare treatments on ACR response, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response, modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score, and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: For ACR 20, guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) and every 4 weeks (Q4W) were comparable (i.e. overlap in credible intervals) to most other agents, including risankizumab, upadacitinib, subcutaneous TNF inhibitors and most IL-17A inhibitors. For PASI 90, guselkumab Q8W and Q4W were better than multiple agents, including subcutaneous TNF and JAK inhibitors. For vdH-S, guselkumab Q8W was similar to risankizumab, while guselkumab Q4W was better; both doses were comparable to most other agents. Most agents had comparable SAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Guselkumab demonstrates better skin efficacy than most other targeted PsA therapies, including upadacitinib. For vdH-S, both guselkumab doses are comparable to most treatments, with both doses ranking higher than most, including upadacitinib and risankizumab. Both guselkumab doses demonstrate comparable ACR responses to most other agents, including upadacitinib and risankizumab, and rank favourably in the network for SAEs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psoríase / Artrite Psoriásica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatology (Oxford) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psoríase / Artrite Psoriásica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatology (Oxford) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article