Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant in irritable bowel syndrome: An update based on meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
Abdelghafar, Yomna Ali; AbdelQadir, Yossef Hassan; Motawea, Karam R; Nasr, Sara Amr; Omran, Hoda Aly Mohamed; Belal, Mohamed Mohamed; Elhashash, Mohamed Mahdy; AbdelAzim, Ahmed Alaa; Shah, Jaffer.
Afiliação
  • Abdelghafar YA; Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
  • AbdelQadir YH; Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
  • Motawea KR; Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
  • Nasr SA; Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
  • Omran HAM; Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
  • Belal MM; Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
  • Elhashash MM; Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
  • AbdelAzim AA; Faculty of Medicine Beni Suef University Beni Suef Egypt.
  • Shah J; New York State Department of Health New York NY USA.
Health Sci Rep ; 5(5): e814, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36110348
Background and Aims: Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is a potential treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Several randomized trials have tested FMT effects using different routes of administration, doses, and sample sizes. We aim to assess the overall efficacy of FMT for IBS patients and the safety of the intervention. Methods: We systematically searched four databases for randomized control trials that studied the efficacy and safety of FMT in IBS patients. Results: We included 8 randomized trials (472 patients) that compared FMT with placebo in IBS patients. Pooled results showed no statistically significant difference between FMT and control groups in the overall change in IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS) at 1 month (p = 0.94), 3/4 months (p = 0.82), and at the end of trials (p = 0.67). No significant difference in the total number of respondents between the FMT and control groups (risk ratios = 1.84, [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-2.65], p = 0.19). Although the oral route of administration showed a significant difference in the number of respondents (p = 0.004), there was no statistically significant difference in the IBS-SSS when subgrouping the oral route of administration (mean difference = 47.57, [95% CI = -8.74-103.87], p = 0.10). Conclusion: FMT is not an effective treatment to relieve all the symptoms of IBS. Even in the groups that showed relatively significant improvement after FMT, the effect was proven to wear off over time and the re-administration carries a low success rate. Future research should consider different bacterial-based interventions such as probiotics or specific antibiotics.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Health Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Health Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article