Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparo-endoscopic management of chole-choledocholithiasis: Rendezvous or intraoperative ERCP? A single tertiary care center experience.
Lagouvardou, Elpiniki; Martines, Gennaro; Tomasicchio, Giovanni; Laforgia, Rita; Pezzolla, Angela; Caputi Iambrenghi, Onofrio.
Afiliação
  • Lagouvardou E; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy.
  • Martines G; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
  • Tomasicchio G; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
  • Laforgia R; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy.
  • Pezzolla A; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
  • Caputi Iambrenghi O; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Front Surg ; 9: 938962, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36117813
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The management of chole-choledocholithiasis remains a matter of debate to preserve minimal invasive management and different options have been proposed, with single- or two-stage approaches. Two techniques of single-stage approach are intraoperative ERCP and laparoscopic rendezvous, which have the great advantage of reducing the length of hospital stay with increased patient compliance. This retrospective study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of intraoperative ERCP and rendezvous technique for more than 15 years. Materials and

methods:

Clinical records of 113 patients who underwent single-stage management for chole-choledocholithiasis between January 2003 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed using a prospectively maintained database. Patients were separated into two groups those managed with intraoperative ERCP and those with rendezvous, and their intraoperative and postoperative parameters were compared. All patients were followed up for 6 months in an outpatient setting.

Results:

A total of 68 (60%) patients were treated with intraoperative ERCP, while the remaining 45 (40%) were treated with rendezvous. There were no significant differences in terms of comorbidities. ERCP was performed with a median operative time of 145 min (104-168) and an endoscopic time of 27 min (15-36). Meanwhile, rendezvous was performed with a significantly lower operative [120 min (94-147)] and endoscopic time [15 min (12-22)]. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Patients treated with rendezvous had a significantly shorter median hospitality stay [4 (3-5) vs. 3 (2-4) days, p < 0.05]. No hospital readmissions or mortalities were observed in either group after 30 days. Ten mild pancreatitis cases were observed, mainly in the intraoperative ERCP group (9 vs. 1, p < 0.05), and all were treated conservatively. Only two patients treated with intraoperative ERCP developed biliary complications later on.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic rendezvous should be considered a preferable alternative to intraoperative ERCP for the treatment of patients with concomitant CBD stones and gallstones.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article