Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Kim, C M; Lee, J B; Shin, S J; Ahn, J B; Lee, M; Kim, H S.
Afiliação
  • Kim CM; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Lee JB; Lung Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul.
  • Shin SJ; Yonsei Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Ahn JB; Yonsei Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Lee M; Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul. Electronic address: MLEE1004@yuhs.ac.
  • Kim HS; Yonsei Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul; Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic addre
ESMO Open ; 7(5): 100577, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36156450
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has improved patient survival in advanced cancers; however, the efficacy of ICIs in elderly patients is still elusive. This study assessed the efficacy of ICIs in elderly patients with advanced cancer in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We carried out a systematic review and identified 30 head-to-head phase II/III randomized controlled trials that compared immunotherapy with the standard of care in advanced solid tumor patients. The data on patients younger or over 65 years of age were indexed from PubMed-Medline, Embase, and Scopus and obtained for meta-analysis. The subgroup analyses were stratified by primary tumor type, line of treatment, or type of immunotherapy, and a meta-regression analysis was carried out after adjusting for all other variables.

RESULTS:

The study included 17 476 patients, comprising 58% (10 119) younger (<65 years old) and 42% (7357) elderly (≥65 years old) patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.85] and 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.85) in the younger and elderly groups, respectively, suggesting similar efficacies of ICIs in these two age groups. The subgroup analyses revealed no significant relationship between age and treatment outcomes, except for the PFS benefit in younger patients with melanoma than in elderly patients (HR 0.44 in younger patients versus 0.65 in elderly patients, P = 0.04). These results were further supported by meta-regression analysis, which showed no statistically significant difference in OS (P = 0.954) and PFS (P = 0.555) between the two age groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings suggest that age-associated impairments of the immune system did not affect the efficacy of ICIs in elderly patients compared to younger patients. Therefore, the choice of ICIs for elderly patients can be considered, regardless of chronological age.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Melanoma Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: ESMO Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Melanoma Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: ESMO Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article