Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Model-based evaluation of the impact of prophylactic vaccination applied to Ebola epidemics in Sierra Leone and Democratic Republic of Congo.
Potluri, Ravi; Kumar, Amit; Oriol-Mathieu, Valérie; Van Effelterre, Thierry; Metz, Laurent; Bhandari, Hitesh.
Afiliação
  • Potluri R; SmartAnalyst Inc., 300 Vesey Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY, 10282, USA. ravi.potluri@smartanalyst.com.
  • Kumar A; SmartAnalyst India Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram, India.
  • Oriol-Mathieu V; Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Van Effelterre T; Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Beerse, Belgium.
  • Metz L; Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • Bhandari H; SmartAnalyst India Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram, India.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 769, 2022 Oct 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36192683
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Protection by preventive Ebola vaccines has been demonstrated in clinical trials, but a complete picture of real-world effectiveness is lacking. Our previous study modeling the impact of preventively vaccinating healthcare workers (HCW) alone or with a proportion of the general population (GP) estimated significant reductions in incidence and mortality. The model assumed 100% vaccine efficacy, which is unlikely in the real world. We enhanced this model to account for lower vaccine efficacy and to factor in reduced infectiousness and lower case fatality rate in vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections.

METHODS:

The previous model was enhanced to still permit a risk, although lower, for vaccinated individuals to become infected. The enhanced model, calibrated with data from epidemics in Sierra Leone (SL) and North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, helped evaluate the impact of preventive Ebola vaccination in different scenarios based on different vaccine efficacy rates (90% and 30% reductions in infection risk in the base and conservative scenarios, respectively; additionally, both scenarios with 50% reductions in infectiousness and mortality) and vaccination coverage among HCWs (30%, 90%) and GP (0%, 5%, and 10%).

RESULTS:

The base scenario estimated that, depending upon the proportions of vaccinated HCWs and GP, 33-85% of cases and 34-87% of deaths during the 2014 SL epidemic and 42-89% of cases and 41-89% of deaths during the 2018 North Kivu epidemic would be averted versus no vaccination. Corresponding estimates for the conservative scenario were 23-74% of cases and 23-77% of deaths averted during the SL epidemic and 31-80% of both cases and deaths averted during the North Kivu epidemic.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preventive vaccination targeting HCW alone or with GP may significantly reduce the size and mortality of an EVD outbreak, even with modest efficacy and coverage. Vaccines may also confer additional benefits through reduced infectiousness and mortality in breakthrough cases.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença pelo Vírus Ebola / Vacinas contra Ebola / Ebolavirus / Epidemias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença pelo Vírus Ebola / Vacinas contra Ebola / Ebolavirus / Epidemias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article