Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Standardised lesion segmentation for imaging biomarker quantitation: a consensus recommendation from ESR and EORTC.
deSouza, Nandita M; van der Lugt, Aad; Deroose, Christophe M; Alberich-Bayarri, Angel; Bidaut, Luc; Fournier, Laure; Costaridou, Lena; Oprea-Lager, Daniela E; Kotter, Elmar; Smits, Marion; Mayerhoefer, Marius E; Boellaard, Ronald; Caroli, Anna; de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee; Kunz, Wolfgang G; Oei, Edwin H; Lecouvet, Frederic; Franca, Manuela; Loewe, Christian; Lopci, Egesta; Caramella, Caroline; Persson, Anders; Golay, Xavier; Dewey, Marc; O'Connor, James P B; deGraaf, Pim; Gatidis, Sergios; Zahlmann, Gudrun.
Afiliação
  • deSouza NM; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. nandita.deSouza@icr.ac.uk.
  • van der Lugt A; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Deroose CM; Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Alberich-Bayarri A; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Bidaut L; Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine (QUIBIM), Valencia, Spain.
  • Fournier L; College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK.
  • Costaridou L; INSERM, Radiology Department, AP-HP, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, PARCC, 75015, Paris, France.
  • Oprea-Lager DE; School of Medicine, University of Patras, University Campus, Rio, 26 500, Patras, Greece.
  • Kotter E; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Smits M; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Mayerhoefer ME; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Boellaard R; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Caroli A; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, USA.
  • de Geus-Oei LF; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kunz WG; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy.
  • Oei EH; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Lecouvet F; Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Franca M; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Loewe C; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lopci E; Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Caramella C; Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Persson A; Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department for Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Golay X; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
  • Dewey M; Radiology Department, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Institut d'Oncologie Thoracique, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Plessis-Robinson, France.
  • O'Connor JPB; Department of Radiology, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • deGraaf P; Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
  • Gatidis S; Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Zahlmann G; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Insights Imaging ; 13(1): 159, 2022 Oct 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36194301
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lesion/tissue segmentation on digital medical images enables biomarker extraction, image-guided therapy delivery, treatment response measurement, and training/validation for developing artificial intelligence algorithms and workflows. To ensure data reproducibility, criteria for standardised segmentation are critical but currently unavailable.

METHODS:

A modified Delphi process initiated by the European Imaging Biomarker Alliance (EIBALL) of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Imaging Group was undertaken. Three multidisciplinary task forces addressed modality and image acquisition, segmentation methodology itself, and standards and logistics. Devised survey questions were fed via a facilitator to expert participants. The 58 respondents to Round 1 were invited to participate in Rounds 2-4. Subsequent rounds were informed by responses of previous rounds. RESULTS/

CONCLUSIONS:

Items with ≥ 75% consensus are considered a recommendation. These include system performance certification, thresholds for image signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and tumour-to-background ratios, spatial resolution, and artefact levels. Direct, iterative, and machine or deep learning reconstruction methods, use of a mixture of CE marked and verified research tools were agreed and use of specified reference standards and validation processes considered essential. Operator training and refreshment were considered mandatory for clinical trials and clinical research. Items with a 60-74% agreement require reporting (site-specific accreditation for clinical research, minimal pixel number within lesion segmented, use of post-reconstruction algorithms, operator training refreshment for clinical practice). Items with ≤ 60% agreement are outside current recommendations for segmentation (frequency of system performance tests, use of only CE-marked tools, board certification of operators, frequency of operator refresher training). Recommendations by anatomical area are also specified.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Insights Imaging Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Insights Imaging Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article