Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal Choice of Adjuvant Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma Following Nephrectomy.
Bottiglieri, Achille; Sepe, Pierangela; Stellato, Marco; Pircher, Chiara; Fotia, Giuseppe; Leone, Alberto Giovanni; Guadalupi, Valentina; Claps, Melanie; Giannatempo, Patrizia; Verzoni, Elena; Procopio, Giuseppe.
Afiliação
  • Bottiglieri A; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Sepe P; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Stellato M; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Pircher C; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Fotia G; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Leone AG; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Guadalupi V; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Claps M; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Giannatempo P; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Verzoni E; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Procopio G; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Cancer Manag Res ; 14: 3071-3081, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36275783
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the fourteenth most common cancer worldwide. In about 55% of cases, it is diagnosed at a localised and/or locally advanced stage and therefore amenable to a curative approach. Although nephrectomy still represents the cornerstone of non-metastatic RCC (nmRCC) treatment, a relapse is observed in about 25-30% of patients undergoing curative surgery. Prognosis is drastically influenced by lymph nodal involvement. After the first disappointing results with a cytokine-based strategy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were tested as adjuvant agents. Despite their efficacy in the metastatic setting, results in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) are not unequivocal and the overall survival (OS) benefit has not been demonstrated. Moreover, their toxicity profile induced a remarkable percentage of patients to discontinue the treatment. On the contrary, the KEYNOTE-564 trial showed the benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo in terms of DFS with promising results in term of OS. Patients included were at intermediate or high risk of relapse, or patients with no evidence of disease after metastasectomy (M1 NED). The updated analysis presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Genito-Urinary (ASCO GU) 2022 confirmed the benefit of pembrolizumab versus placebo over time, although OS data are still immature. A longer follow-up and the several ongoing trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) will provide further data about adjuvant immuno-oncology (IO). Furthermore, the patients' selection based on clinical or biological features will be crucial in order to identify who benefits most from treatments.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Manag Res Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Manag Res Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article