Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antigenicity is preserved with fixative solutions used in human gross anatomy: A mice brain immunohistochemistry study.
Frigon, Eve-Marie; Dadar, Mahsa; Boire, Denis; Maranzano, Josefina.
Afiliação
  • Frigon EM; Department of Anatomy, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
  • Dadar M; Department of Psychiatry, The Douglas Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Boire D; Department of Anatomy, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
  • Maranzano J; Department of Anatomy, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Front Neuroanat ; 16: 957358, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36312297
ABSTRACT

Background:

Histology remains the gold-standard to assess human brain biology, so ex vivo studies using tissue from brain banks are standard practice in neuroscientific research. However, a larger number of specimens could be obtained from gross anatomy laboratories. These specimens are fixed with solutions appropriate for dissections, but whether they also preserve brain tissue antigenicity is unclear. Therefore, we perfused mice brains with solutions used for human body preservation to assess and compare the tissue quality and antigenicity of the main cell populations. Materials and

methods:

Twenty-eight C57BL/6J mice were perfused with 4% formaldehyde (FAS, N = 9), salt-saturated solution (SSS, N = 9), and alcohol solution (AS, N = 10). The brains were cut into 40 µm sections for antigenicity analysis and were assessed by immunohistochemistry of four antigens neuronal nuclei (NeuN), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP astrocytes), ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1-microglia), and myelin proteolipid protein (PLP). We compared the fixatives according to multiple variables perfusion quality, ease of manipulation, tissue quality, immunohistochemistry quality, and antigenicity preservation.

Results:

The perfusion quality was better using FAS and worse using AS. The manipulation was very poor in SSS brains. FAS- and AS-fixed brains showed higher tissue and immunohistochemistry quality than the SSS brains. All antigens were readily observed in every specimen, regardless of the fixative solution.

Conclusion:

Solutions designed to preserve specimens for human gross anatomy dissections also preserve tissue antigenicity in different brain cells. This offers opportunities for the use of human brains fixed in gross anatomy laboratories to assess normal or pathological conditions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Neuroanat Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Neuroanat Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article