Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma.
Ho, Joel; Mattei, Jane; Tetzlaff, Michael; Williams, Michelle D; Davies, Michael A; Diab, Adi; Oliva, Isabella C Glitza; McQuade, Jennifer; Patel, Sapna P; Tawbi, Hussein; Wong, Michael K; Fisher, Sarah B; Hanna, Ehab; Keung, Emily Z; Ross, Merrick; Weiser, Roi; Su, Shirley Y; Frumovitz, Michael; Meyer, Larissa A; Jazaeri, Amir; Pettaway, Curtis A; Guadagnolo, B Ashleigh; Bishop, Andrew J; Mitra, Devarati; Farooqi, Ahsan; Bassett, Roland; Faria, Silvana; Nagarajan, Priyadharsini; Amaria, Rodabe N.
Afiliação
  • Ho J; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Mattei J; Oncology Department, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Tetzlaff M; Division of Dermatopathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Williams MD; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Davies MA; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Diab A; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Oliva ICG; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • McQuade J; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Patel SP; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Tawbi H; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Wong MK; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Fisher SB; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Hanna E; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Keung EZ; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Ross M; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Weiser R; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Su SY; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Frumovitz M; Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Meyer LA; Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Jazaeri A; Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Pettaway CA; Department of Urologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Guadagnolo BA; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Bishop AJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Mitra D; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Farooqi A; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Bassett R; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Faria S; Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Nagarajan P; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Amaria RN; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Front Oncol ; 12: 1001150, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36324592
ABSTRACT

Background:

Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has recently demonstrated impressive outcomes in patients with stage 3 cutaneous melanoma. However, the safety, efficacy, and outcome of neoadjuvant CPI in patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) are not well studied as MM is a rare melanoma subtype. CPI such as combination nivolumab and ipilimumab achieves response rates of 37-43% in unresectable or metastatic MM but there is limited data regarding the efficacy of these agents in the preoperative setting. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant CPI is a safe and feasible approach for patients with resectable MM.

Method:

Under an institutionally approved protocol, we identified adult MM patients with resectable disease who received neoadjuvant anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 between 2015 to 2019 at our institution. Clinical information include age, gender, presence of nodal involvement or satellitosis, functional status, pre-treatment LDH, tumor mutation status, and treatment data was collected. Outcomes include event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), pathologic response rate (PRR), and grade ≥3 toxicities.

Results:

We identified 36 patients. Median age was 62; 58% were female. Seventy-eight percent of patients received anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4. Node positive disease or satellite lesions was present at the time of treatment initiation in 47% of patients. Primary sites of disease were anorectal (53%), urogenital (25%), head and neck (17%), and esophageal (6%). A minority of patients did not undergo surgery due to complete response (n=3, 8%) and disease progression (n=6, 17%), respectively. With a median follow up of 37.9 months, the median EFS was 9.2 months with 3-year EFS rate of 29%. Median OS had not been reached and 3-year OS rate was 55%. ORR was 47% and PRR was 35%. EFS was significantly higher for patients with objective response and for patients with pathologic response. OS was significantly higher for patients with pathologic response. Grade 3 toxicities were reported in 39% of patients.

Conclusion:

Neoadjuvant CPI for resectable MM is a feasible approach with signs of efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. As there is currently no standard approach for resectable MM, this study supports further investigations using neoadjuvant therapy for these patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article