Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A narrative review of the surgical management of Paget-Schroetter syndrome: case series and long-term follow-up.
Bashir, Mohamad; Tan, Sven Zcp; Jubouri, Matti; Salahia, Ghali; Whiston, Richard J; White, Richard D; Bailey, Damian M; Williams, Ian M.
Afiliação
  • Bashir M; Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Health Education and Improvement Wales, Wales, UK.
  • Tan SZ; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Jubouri M; Hull-York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
  • Salahia G; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Health Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
  • Whiston RJ; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Health Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
  • White RD; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Health Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
  • Bailey DM; Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK.
  • Williams IM; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Health Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther ; 12(5): 744-755, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36329970
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objective:

Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) is an uncommon disorder which causes thrombosis of the subclavian vein (SV). This is due to compression of the SV by the surrounding anatomical structures. The optimal management of PSS remains subject to debate, with endovascular intervention and open surgical decompression being favoured current options. This review article evaluates both approaches to the management of PSS, while also presenting a case series with long-term follow-up of patients that underwent open surgical intervention for PSS.

Methods:

The clinical outcomes of PSS patients undergoing different 4 surgical approaches to perform surgical decompression are included. A literature review, across publications from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, was conducted with specific criteria to facilitate evaluation of both open surgical and endovascular approaches to the management of PSS. Key Content and

Findings:

Evaluation of data from the included case series and available literature suggests that endovascular thrombolytic devices offer better clinical results, however, SV decompression is still required for successful resolution.

Conclusions:

An approach to PSS encompassing endovascular intervention followed by surgical anatomical decompression may provide optimal outcomes as both intrinsic lesions and extrinsic compression of the SV is treated. However, further prospective investigation into this field is warranted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article