Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preliminary validation of a brief PROM assessing psychological distress in patients with malignant mesothelioma: The mesothelioma psychological distress tool-Patients.
Guglielmucci, Fanny; Bonafede, Michela; Azzolina, Danila; Marinaccio, Alessandro; Franzoi, Isabella Giulia; Migliore, Enrica; Mensi, Carolina; Chellini, Elisabetta; Romeo, Elisa; Grosso, Federica; Granieri, Antonella.
Afiliação
  • Guglielmucci F; Department of Philosophy, Communication and Performing Arts, University of Roma Tre, Rome, Italy.
  • Bonafede M; Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), Rome, Italy.
  • Azzolina D; Department of Environmental and Preventive Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Marinaccio A; Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), Rome, Italy.
  • Franzoi IG; Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Migliore E; COR Piedmont, Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, University of Turin and CPO-Piedmont, Turin, Italy.
  • Mensi C; COR Lombardy, Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Chellini E; COR Tuscany, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Unit of Environmental and Occupational Epidemiology, Florence, Italy.
  • Romeo E; COR Lazio, Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
  • Grosso F; Mesothelioma Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Granieri A; Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Front Psychol ; 13: 974982, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36506969
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Psychological suffering in malignant mesothelioma (MM) differs from that in other cancers because of its occupational etiology, and we aimed to develop specific patient-reported outcome measures to assess it.

Methods:

We used a multi-method prospective observational multicentric study (N = 149), and a preliminary questionnaire validation was performed through a Bayesian approach.

Results:

Item analysis showed a good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.79 [95% CI = 0.74-0.93]. Twenty of the 41 initial items were selected as posterior 95% highest density interval factor loading standardized effect size fell outside of the region of practical equivalence. Bayesian exploratory factor analysis showed a two-factor structure (1) Trauma-related reactions (TR, 13 items) and (2) Claim for justice (CJ, 7 items), confirmed by the Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis. Latent factors were poorly correlated (Posterior median 0.13; 95% CI = -0.079 to 0.323). The 90% root mean square error of approximation posterior median was 0.04 [90% CI = 0.03-0.58]; the 90% chi-square posterior median was 242 [90% CI = 209-287].

Conclusion:

Psychological suffering in MM patients implies negative cognitive, emotional, and somatic reactions related to the traumatic impact of the disease and the need to obtain justice through economic compensation. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Patients could be a promising and reliable instrument to assess MM patients' psychological distress.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article