Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Spontaneity matters! Network alterations before and after spontaneous and active facial self-touches: An EEG functional connectivity study.
Butz, Kevin H G; Mueller, Stephanie M; Spille, Jente L; Martin, Sven; Grunwald, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Butz KHG; University of Leipzig, Paul Flechsig Institute, Centre of Neuropathology and Brain Research, Haptic Research Laboratory, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  • Mueller SM; University of Leipzig, Paul Flechsig Institute, Centre of Neuropathology and Brain Research, Haptic Research Laboratory, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  • Spille JL; University of Leipzig, Paul Flechsig Institute, Centre of Neuropathology and Brain Research, Haptic Research Laboratory, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  • Martin S; University of Leipzig, Paul Flechsig Institute, Centre of Neuropathology and Brain Research, Haptic Research Laboratory, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  • Grunwald M; University of Leipzig, Paul Flechsig Institute, Centre of Neuropathology and Brain Research, Haptic Research Laboratory, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: mgrun@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Int J Psychophysiol ; 184: 28-38, 2023 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563880
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite humans frequently performing spontaneous facial self-touches (sFST), the function of this behavior remains speculative. sFST have been discussed in the context of self-regulation, emotional homeostasis, working memory processes, and attention focus. First evidence indicates that sFST and active facial self-touches (aFST) are neurobiologically different phenomena. The aim of the present analysis was to examine EEG-based connectivity in the course of sFST and aFST to test the hypotheses that sFST affect brain network interactions relevant for other than sensorimotor processes.

METHODS:

To trigger spontaneous FST a previously successful setting was used 60 healthy participants manually explored two haptic stimuli and held the shapes of the stimuli in memory for a 14 min retention interval. Afterwards the shapes were drawn on a sheet of paper. During the retention interval, artifact-free EEG-data of 97 sFST by 32 participants were recorded. At the end of the experiment, the participants performed aFST with both hands successively. For the EEG-data, connectivity was computed and compared between the phases before and after sFST and aFST and between the respective before-and the after-phases.

RESULTS:

For the before-after comparison, brainwide distributed significant connectivity differences (p < .00079) were observed for sFST, but not for aFST. Additionally, comparing the before- and after-phases of sFST and aFST, respectively, revealed increased similarity between the after-phases than between the before-phases.

CONCLUSION:

The results support the assumption that sFST and aFST are neurobiologically different phenomena. Furthermore, the aligned network properties of the after-phases compared to the before-phases indicate that sFST serve self-regulatory functions that aFST do not serve.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Percepção do Tato Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Psychophysiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Percepção do Tato Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Psychophysiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article