Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does antenatal cholecalciferol supplementation affect the mode or timing of delivery? Post hoc analyses of the MAVIDOS randomized controlled trial.
Moon, Rebecca J; D'Angelo, Stefania; Crozier, Sarah R; Curtis, Elizabeth M; Fernandes, Michelle; Kermack, Alexandra J; Davies, Justin H; Godfrey, Keith M; Bishop, Nicholas J; Kennedy, Stephen H; Prentice, Ann; Schoenmakers, Inez; Fraser, Robert; Gandhi, Saurabh V; Inskip, Hazel M; Javaid, Muhammad Kassim; Papageorghiou, Aris T; Cooper, Cyrus; Harvey, Nicholas C.
Afiliação
  • Moon RJ; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • D'Angelo S; Paediatric Endocrinology, University Hospital Southampton National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Crozier SR; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Curtis EM; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Fernandes M; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Kermack AJ; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Davies JH; Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Godfrey KM; Paediatric Endocrinology, University Hospital Southampton National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Bishop NJ; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Kennedy SH; NIHR Southampton Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Prentice A; Academic Unit of Child Health, Sheffield Children's Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Schoenmakers I; Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Fraser R; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, previously at MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
  • Gandhi SV; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Inskip HM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sheffield Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Javaid MK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sheffield Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Papageorghiou AT; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Cooper C; NIHR Southampton Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Harvey NC; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 45(3): 738-747, 2023 08 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585903
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Observational studies relating maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D status to timing and mode of delivery have reported inconsistent results. We assessed the effect of antenatal cholecalciferol supplementation on the incidence of preterm birth, delivery mode and post-partum haemorrhage (PPH).

METHODS:

MAVIDOS was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 1000 IU/day cholecalciferol from 14 weeks' gestation until delivery. Gestational age, mode of delivery [categorized as spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), instrumental (including forceps and vacuum extraction) or Caesarean section] and PPH (>500 ml estimated blood loss) were determined from medical records.

RESULTS:

A total of 965 women participated in the study until delivery. Gestation at birth and incidence of preterm birth (cholecalciferol 5.7%, placebo 4.5%, P = 0.43) were similar between the two treatment groups. SVD (versus instrumental or Caesarean delivery) was more likely in women randomized to cholecalciferol [Relative Risk (RR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02,1.25] due to lower instrumental (RR 0.68, 95%CI 0.51,0.91) but similar risk of Caesarean delivery (RR 0.94, 95%CI 0.74,1.19). PPH was less common in women randomized to cholecalciferol [32.1% compared with placebo (38.1%, P = 0.054) overall], but similar when stratified by delivery mode.

CONCLUSIONS:

Antenatal cholecalciferol supplementation did not alter timing of birth or prevalence of preterm birth but demonstrated a possible effect on the likelihood of SVD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cesárea / Nascimento Prematuro Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Public Health (Oxf) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cesárea / Nascimento Prematuro Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Public Health (Oxf) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article