Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is cement mantle thickness a primary cause of aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty?
Cox, Zach C; Engstrom, Stephen M; Shinar, Andrew A; Polkowski, Gregory G; Mason, J Bohannon; Martin, J Ryan.
Afiliação
  • Cox ZC; OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC, 250 N Caswell Rd Suit 200A, Charlotte, NC 28207, USA.
  • Engstrom SM; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Ave S Suite 4200, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
  • Shinar AA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Ave S Suite 4200, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
  • Polkowski GG; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Ave S Suite 4200, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
  • Mason JB; OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC, 250 N Caswell Rd Suit 200A, Charlotte, NC 28207, USA.
  • Martin JR; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Ave S Suite 4200, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: John.Martin@vumc.org.
Knee ; 40: 305-312, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36592499
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee replacement is one of the leading causes of long-term failure. Cement mantle thickness has been implicated as a source of aseptic tibial loosening. Therefore, the following study was designed to determine (1) what is the cement mantle thickness in patients that develop aseptic tibial loosening, and (2) is there a difference in cement mantle thickness based on the interface of failure?

METHOD:

This retrospective cohort included 216 patients revised for aseptic tibial loosening. Patient demographics, operative data, and clinical outcomes were recorded. A preoperative radiographic assessment was performed to determine the interface of failure and the thickness of the cement mantle using the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System zones.

RESULTS:

The average patient age was 65 years and body mass index was 33.7 kg/m2. 203 patients demonstrated radiographic failure at the implant-cement interface and 13 patients demonstrated failure at the cement-bone interface. The average cement mantle thickness of each radiographic zone for the entire cohort on the AP and lateral views was 4.4 and 4.5 mm, respectively. The average cement mantle thickness of patients that developed failure at the implant-cement interface was significantly greater than patients that failed at the cement-bone interface in each radiographic zone (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients that develop implant loosening at the cement-bone interface were noted to have a significantly decreased cement mantle compared to patients that failed at the implant-cement interface. Methods for decreasing tibial implant loosening should likely focus on improving the fixation at the implant-cement interface.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Knee Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Knee Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article