Fibular- Versus Tibiofibular-Based Reconstruction of the Posterolateral Corner of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Am J Sports Med
; 51(14): 3880-3892, 2023 12.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36598154
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Fibular- and tibiofibular-based reconstructions are the gold standard treatment for posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee. Despite comparable outcomes in biomechanical studies, clinical results comparing these constructs remain elusive with no consensus reached regarding the best treatment option.PURPOSE:
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare fibular- and tibiofibular-based techniques for posterolateral corner reconstruction. We aimed to identify whether any differences existed between the 2 techniques in terms of clinical outcomes and rotational and varus stability. STUDYDESIGN:
Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.METHODS:
The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following search terms ("posterolateral corner" OR "fibular collateral ligament" OR "lateral collateral ligament" OR "popliteus tendon" OR "popliteofibular ligament") AND ("reconstruction" OR "LaPrade" OR "Larson" OR "Arciero"). Data pertaining to all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), postoperative complications, and valgus and rotational stability were extracted from each study. The pooled outcome data were analyzed by random- and fixed-effects models.RESULTS:
After abstract and full-text screening, 6 clinical studies were included. In total, there were 183 patients, of which 90 received fibular-based and 93 tibiofibular-based reconstruction. The majority of studies used similar surgical techniques regarding tunnel orientation, attachment sites, and graft fixation sequence. There were no differences between the groups in terms of PROMs and subjective knee scores at a mean of 20.3 months. The techniques were equally effective in restoring varus and rotational stability. Subgroup analysis revealed that the stability of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction postoperatively was not affected by either construct.CONCLUSION:
Both constructs had comparable clinical outcomes and were equally effective in restoring varus and rotational stability for PLC knee injuries. The fibular-based technique may offer advantages in view of being less technically demanding and invasive and requiring fewer grafts with a quicker operative time. However, higher quality studies are required to reinforce or refute such conclusions, as the majority of studies in this review were poor to fair quality.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Ligamento Cruzado Posterior
/
Traumatismos do Joelho
Tipo de estudo:
Prognostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Aspecto:
Patient_preference
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Am J Sports Med
Ano de publicação:
2023
Tipo de documento:
Article