Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas, Arnas; Peters, Max; Martel, Paul; van Rossum, Peter S N; La Rosa, Stefano; Meuwly, Jean-Yves; Roth, Beat; Valerio, Massimo.
Afiliação
  • Rakauskas A; Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Peters M; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Martel P; Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • van Rossum PSN; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • La Rosa S; Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Meuwly JY; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology Unit, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
  • Roth B; Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Valerio M; Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
PLoS One ; 18(1): e0280262, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36652429
INTRODUCTION: High-resolution micro-ultrasound (micro-US) is a novel precise imaging modality that allows targeted prostate biopsies and multiparametric magnet resonance imaging (mpMRI) fusion. Its high resolution relying on a 29 MHz transducer allows real-time visualisation of prostate cancer lesions; this might overcome the inaccuracy of conventional MRI-US fusion biopsy strategies. We compared cancer detection rates in patients who underwent transrectal (TR-B) versus transperineal (TP-B) MR-micro-US fusion biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1:2 propensity score matching was performed in 322 consecutive procedures: 56 TR-B and 266 TP-B. All prostate biopsies were performed using ExactVuTM micro-US system with mpMRI image fusion. Clinically significant disease was defined as grade group ≥2. The primary objective was to evaluate the detection of clinically significant disease according to access route. The secondary outcomes were to compare the respective detection rates of random and targeted biopsies stratified per access route and to evaluate micro-US for its potential added value. RESULTS: 47 men undergoing TR-B and 88 undergoing TP-B were matched for age, PSA, clinical stage, prostate volume, PIRADS score, number of mpMRI-visible lesions and indication to biopsy. The detection rates of clinically significant and of any prostate cancer did not differ between the two groups (45% TR-B vs 42% TP-B; p = 0.8, and 57% TR-B vs 59% TP-B; p = 0.9, respectively). Detection rates also did not differ significantly between random (p = 0.4) and targeted biopsies (p = 0.7) stratified per access route. Micro-US targeted biopsy detected 36 MRI-invisible lesions in 33 patients; 19% of these lesions were positive for clinically significant disease. Overall, micro-US targeted biopsies upgraded 2% of patients to clinically significant disease that would have been missed otherwise. CONCLUSIONS: MR-micro-US-fusion TR-B and TP-B have similar diagnostic yields in terms of detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer. Micro-US targeted biopsy appears to have an additional diagnostic value over systematic and MRI-targeted biopsies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article