Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients' treatment expectations.
Shedden-Mora, Meike C; Alberts, Jannis; Petrie, Keith J; Laferton, Johannes A C; von Blanckenburg, Pia; Kohlmann, Sebastian; Nestoriuc, Yvonne; Löwe, Bernd.
Afiliação
  • Shedden-Mora MC; Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Alberts J; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Petrie KJ; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Laferton JAC; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • von Blanckenburg P; Department of Medicine, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Kohlmann S; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Nestoriuc Y; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Löwe B; Department of Clinical Psychology, Helmut-Schmidt-University /University of the federal armed forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One ; 18(1): e0280472, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36689398
BACKGROUND: Patients' expectations, as a central mechanism behind placebo and nocebo effects, are an important predictor of health outcomes. Yet, theoretically based generic assessment tools allowing for an integrated understanding of expectations across conditions and treatments are lacking. Based on the preliminary 35-item version, this study reports the development and validation of the Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q), a generic, multidimensional self-report scale measuring patients' expectations of medical and psychological treatments. METHODS: The TEX-Q was developed in a validation sample of n = 251 patients undergoing different treatments using exploratory factor analyses and item analyses, as well as analysis of convergent and divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in an independent sample of n = 303 patients undergoing cancer treatment. Two-weeks test-retest reliability was assessed in n = 28 psychosomatic outpatients. RESULTS: Factor analyses revealed six theoretically founded stable subscales. The TEX-Q assesses expectations of treatment benefit, positive impact, adverse events, negative impact, process and behavioural control with a total of 15 items. Results for the subscales and the sum score indicated good internal consistency (α = .71-.92), moderate to high test-retest reliability (r = .39-.76) as well as good convergent validity with regard to other expectation measures (r = .42-.58) and divergent validity with regard to measures of generalized expectations (r < .32) and psychopathology (r < .28). CONCLUSIONS: While further validation is needed, the results suggest that the TEX-Q is a valid and reliable scale for the generic, multidimensional assessment of patients' treatment expectations. The TEX-Q overcomes constraints of ad-hoc and disease-specific scales, while allowing to compare the impact of different expectation constructs across conditions and treatments.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Motivação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Motivação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article