Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stretching, Bracing, and Devices for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis-Associated Joint Contractures in Nonoperated Joints: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Campbell, T Mark; Westby, Marie; Ghogomu, Elizabeth Tanjong; Fournier, John; Ghaedi, Bahareh Bahram; Welch, Vivian.
Afiliação
  • Campbell TM; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Westby M; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ghogomu ET; Bone and Joint Laboratory, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Fournier J; The Ottawa Hospital, Department of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ghaedi BB; University of Ottawa, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Welch V; Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sports Health ; 15(6): 867-877, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691685
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Many patients with osteoarthritis (OA) develop range of motion (ROM) restrictions in their affected joints (contractures), associated with worse outcomes and rising healthcare costs. Effective treatment guidance for lost ROM in OA-affected joints is lacking.

OBJECTIVE:

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of stretching and/or bracing protocols on native (nonoperated) joint ROM in the setting of radiographically diagnosed OA. DATA SOURCES Seven databases, English-language. STUDY SELECTION Studies including participants with radiographically diagnosed OA in any native joint evaluating the effect of stretching or bracing on ROM. STUDY

DESIGN:

Systematic review and meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 2. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion and assessed risk of bias in included trials. Primary outcomes were ROM, pain, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS:

We identified 6284 articles. A total of 9 randomized controlled trials, all evaluating the knee, met eligibility criteria. For stretching, 3 pooled studies reported total ROM, which improved by mean difference (MD) of 9.3° (95% CI 5.0°,13.5°) versus controls. Two pooled studies showed improved knee flexion ROM (MD 10.8° [7.3°,14.2°]) versus controls. Five studies were pooled for knee extension with mean improvement 9.1° [3.4°,14.8°] versus controls. Seven pooled studies showed reduced pain (standardized MD 1.9 [1.2,2.6]). One study reported improved knee extension of 3.7° [2.9°,4.5°] with use of a device. No studies used orthoses. One study reported on AEs, with none noted. Performance bias was present in all included studies, and only 3 studies clearly reported blinding of outcome assessors. Strength of evidence for primary outcomes was considered moderate.

CONCLUSION:

There was moderate-quality evidence that stretching is an effective strategy for improving knee total, flexion and extension ROM, and pain. Our findings suggest that stretching to regain joint ROM in OA is not futile and that stretching appears to be an appropriate conservative intervention to improve patient outcomes as part of a comprehensive knee OA treatment plan before arthroplasty.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Contratura / Osteoartrite do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sports Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Contratura / Osteoartrite do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sports Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article