Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
National landscape assessment of academic medical center support for expanded access to investigational products.
Gravelin, Misty; Adamo, Joan E; Ellison, Sharon; Segear, Erika; Parrish, Amanda B; Deeter, Christine; Hamill, Jennifer; Rigan, Laurie; Mashour, George A; Weatherwax, Kevin J.
Afiliação
  • Gravelin M; Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Adamo JE; Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Ellison S; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Segear E; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Parrish AB; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Deeter C; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Hamill J; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Rigan L; Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Mashour GA; Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Weatherwax KJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 7(1): e4, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36755539
Expanded access (EA) provides a pathway for the clinical use of investigational products (drugs, biologics, and medical devices) for patients who are without satisfactory therapeutic options and for whom a clinical trial is not available. Academic medical centers (AMCs) are likely to encounter EA requests, but it is unknown what support is available at these institutions for physicians seeking EA for patients. METHODS: A landscape assessment was conducted at AMCs, focused on those within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) consortium. RESULTS: Forty-seven responses were evaluated including 42 CTSA hubs. The large majority (43 of 47 respondents) reported using single-patient EA, while 37 reported multi-patient industry sponsored EA and 37 reported multi-patient investigator-initiated EA. Only half reported central tracking of EA requests. Support was available at 89% of sites for single-patient EA but less often for multi-patient EA. Types of support varied and were focused largely on the initial submission to the FDA. CONCLUSION: Use of and support for EA is widespread at AMCs, with support focused on single-patient requests. Gaps in support are common for activities after initial submission, such as FDA reporting and data collection.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article