Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilising an accelerated Delphi process to develop consensus on the requirement and components of a pre-procedural core robotic surgery curriculum.
Burke, Joshua Richard; Fleming, Christina A; King, Martin; El-Sayed, Charlotte; Bolton, William S; Munsch, Chris; Harji, Deena; Bach, Simon P; Collins, Justin W.
Afiliação
  • Burke JR; The Association of Surgeons in Training, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England, UK. joshburke@doctors.org.uk.
  • Fleming CA; Robotics and Digital Surgery Initiative, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England. joshburke@doctors.org.uk.
  • King M; Leeds Institute Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. joshburke@doctors.org.uk.
  • El-Sayed C; The Association of Surgeons in Training, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England, UK.
  • Bolton WS; The Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Munsch C; The Association of Surgeons in Training, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England, UK.
  • Harji D; Craigavon Area Hospital, Craigavon, Northern Ireland.
  • Bach SP; Technology Enhanced Learning Directorate of Innovation, Digital and Transformation, Health Education England, London, England.
  • Collins JW; Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
J Robot Surg ; 17(4): 1443-1455, 2023 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36757562
ABSTRACT
Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) continues to grow globally. Despite this, in the UK and Ireland, it is estimated that over 70% of surgical trainees across all specialities have no access to robot-assisted surgical training (RAST). This study aimed to provide educational stakeholders guidance on a pre-procedural core robotic surgery curriculum (PPCRC) from the perspective of the end user; the surgical trainee. The study was conducted in four Phases P1 a steering group was formed to review current literature and summarise the evidence, P2 Pan-Specialty Trainee Panel Virtual Classroom Discussion, P3 Accelerated Delphi Process and P4 Formulation of Recommendations. Forty-three surgeons in training representing all surgical specialties and training levels contributed to the three round Delphi process. Additions to the second- and third-round surveys were formulated based on the answers and comments from previous rounds. Consensus opinion was defined as ≥ 80% agreement. There was 100% response from all three rounds. The resulting formulated guidance showed good internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of > 0.8. There was 97.7% agreement that a standardised PPCRC would be advantageous to training and that, independent of speciality, there should be a common approach (95.5% agreement). Consensus was reached in multiple areas 1. Experience and Exposure, 2. Access and context, 3. Curriculum Components, 4 Target Groups and Delivery, 5. Objective Metrics, Benchmarking and Assessment. Using the Delphi methodology, we achieved multispecialty consensus among trainees to develop and reach content validation for the requirements and components of a PPCRC. This guidance will benefit from further validation following implementation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Robot Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Robot Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article