Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alcoholic vs. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Vascular Branching Heterogeneity on Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Diagnostic Marker.
Garrido, Daniel; Noverati, Nicholas; Robbins, Justin; Dave, Jaydev K; Naringrekar, Haresh; Mitchell, Donald G; Marzio, Dina Halegoua-De.
Afiliação
  • Garrido D; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Noverati N; Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Robbins J; Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Dave JK; Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Naringrekar H; Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Mitchell DG; Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Marzio DH; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Clin Transl Hepatol ; 11(3): 534-539, 2023 Jun 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36969887
ABSTRACT
Background and

Aims:

Distinguishing alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with biopsy alone is often difficult without a reliable clinical context. A novel finding on liver imaging, perivascular branching heterogeneity, has shown promise in distinguishing between these chronic liver diseases. Our study investigated the role of this finding on imaging to differentiate between ASH and NASH. The aim of this study was to determine the utility and reproducibility of this novel radiographic marker to help distinguish ASH from NASH.

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between 2016 and 2020 in patients with both liver biopsy-confirmed steatohepatitis/chronic hepatitis and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging within 13 months of each other. Two radiologists, blinded to patient clinical history and diagnosis, categorized the appearance of the liver as 1- homogeneity, 2- mild heterogeneity, 3- moderate heterogeneity, 4- possible perivascular branching, 5- definite perivascular branching.

Results:

Of the 90 patients in the study, 60 were identified as NASH and 30 as ASH. The area under the curve (AUC) for both reader 1 and 2 when using the 5-point scale was 0.69 (CI 0.56-0.82, p=0.006) and 0.72 (CI 0.60-0.85, p=0.001), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) for identification of ASH when scoring 5 was 64.7% and 66.7% for reader 1 and 2, respectively. Interclass correlation coefficient was 0.74 in patients with ASH, indicating moderate reliability among both readers.

Conclusions:

Identification of this perivascular branching pattern on imaging is a promising novel diagnostic marker that can be used with other methods to help distinguish between ASH and NASH.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Hepatol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Hepatol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article