Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Active sensitization to dimethylthiocarbamylbenzothiazol sulphide: An unexpectedly strong rubber contact allergen.
Isaksson, Marléne; Bergendorff, Ola; Hamnerius, Nils; Pontén, Ann; Svedman, Cecilia; Hauksson, Inese; Bruze, Magnus.
Afiliação
  • Isaksson M; Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Bergendorff O; Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Hamnerius N; Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Pontén A; Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Svedman C; Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Hauksson I; Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Bruze M; Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(6): 472-479, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36975130
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The two dialkylthiocarbamyl benzothiazole sulphides, dimethyl-thiocarbamylbenzothiazole sulphide (DMTBS) and diethylthio-carbamylbenzothiazole sulphide (DETBS) were shown to be good markers of both thiuram and mercaptobenzothiazole sensitivity.

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate if DMTBS and/or DETBS could be better markers of contact allergy to common rubber additives than the ones currently used.

METHODS:

Sixty-eight dermatitis patients were patch tested with DMTBS and DETBS, both at 1% in petrolatum (pet). Because of late reactions in 10 patients, these were retested to DMTBS and DETBS in serial dilutions. Tetramethylthiuram monosulphide (TMTM) 1.0% pet was also tested.

RESULTS:

At the initial reading Days 3 and 7, no reactions were noted to DMTBS or DETBS. At retesting, 10 of the 68 (15%) patients reacted positively to lower concentrations of DMTBS than the initial test concentration. Seven of 8 also reacted to TMTM. Three of them had positive reactions to DEBTS. All 10 patients had reactions to more diluted solutions to DMBTS than to DEBTS (p = 0.0077; Mc-Nemar test, two-sided).

CONCLUSIONS:

Results speak for patch test sensitization to DMTBS with cross-reactivity to TMTM and also DEBTS. DMTBS and DEBTS could be new markers of rubber allergy but a safe test concentration must be found.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Alérgica de Contato Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Alérgica de Contato Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article