Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of primary treatment methods on sludge characteristics and digestibility, and wastewater treatment plant-wide economics.
Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa; Kosar, Sadiye; Gulhan, Hazal; Cicekalan, Busra; Ucas, Gulin; Atli, Ezgi; Guven, Huseyin; Ozgun, Hale; Ozturk, Izzet; Koyuncu, Ismail; van Lier, Jules B; Volcke, Eveline I P; Ersahin, Mustafa Evren.
Afiliação
  • Abdelrahman AM; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey; BioCo Research Group, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Electronic address: amr.abdelrahman@ugent.be.
  • Kosar S; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Gulhan H; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Cicekalan B; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Ucas G; ISKI, Istanbul Water and Sewerage Administration, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Atli E; ISKI, Istanbul Water and Sewerage Administration, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Guven H; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Ozgun H; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey; National Research Center on Membrane Technologies, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Ozturk I; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Koyuncu I; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey; National Research Center on Membrane Technologies, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • van Lier JB; Department of Water management, Section Sanitary Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Volcke EIP; BioCo Research Group, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
  • Ersahin ME; Environmental Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey; National Research Center on Membrane Technologies, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Water Res ; 235: 119920, 2023 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37003116
ABSTRACT
Biogas production from anaerobic sludge digestion plays a central role for wastewater treatment plants to become more energy-efficient or even energy-neutral. Dedicated configurations have been developed to maximize the diversion of soluble and suspended organic matter to sludge streams for energy production through anaerobic digestion, such as A-stage treatment or chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) instead of primary clarifiers. Still, it remains to be investigated to what extent these different treatment steps affect the sludge characteristics and digestibility, which may also impact the economic feasibility of the integrated systems. In this study, a detailed characterization has been performed for sludge obtained from primary clarification (primary sludge), A-stage treatment (A-sludge) and CEPT. The characteristics of all sludges differed significantly from each other. The organic compounds in primary sludge consisted mainly of 40% of carbohydrates, 23% of lipids, and 21% of proteins. A-sludge was characterized by a high amount of proteins (40%) and a moderate amount of carbohydrates (23%), and lipids (16%), while in CEPT sludge, organic compounds were mainly 26% of proteins, 18% of carbohydrates, 18% of lignin, and 12% of lipids. The highest methane yield was obtained from anaerobic digestion of primary sludge (347 ± 16 mL CH4/g VS) and A-sludge (333 ± 6 mL CH4/g VS), while it was lower for CEPT sludge (245 ± 5 mL CH4/g VS). Furthermore, an economic evaluation has been carried out for the three systems, considering energy consumption and recovery, as well as effluent quality and chemical costs. Energy consumption of A-stage was the highest among the three configurations due to aeration energy demand, while CEPT had the highest operational costs due to chemical use. Energy surplus was the highest by the use of CEPT, resulting from the highest fraction of recovered organic matter. By considering the effluent quality of the three systems, CEPT had the highest benefits, followed by A-stage. Integration of CEPT or A-stage, instead of primary clarification in existing wastewater treatment plants, would potentially improve the effluent quality and energy recovery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esgotos / Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Water Res Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esgotos / Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Water Res Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article