Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing machine learning methods for predicting land development intensity.
Gu, Guanhai; Wu, Bin; Zhang, Wenzhu; Lu, Rucheng; Feng, Xiaoling; Liao, Wenhui; Pang, Caiping; Lu, Shengquan.
Afiliação
  • Gu G; School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanjing, China.
  • Wu B; School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanjing, China.
  • Zhang W; School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanjing, China.
  • Lu R; School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanjing, China.
  • Feng X; School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanjing, China.
  • Liao W; School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanjing, China.
  • Pang C; School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanjing, China.
  • Lu S; School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanjing, China.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0282476, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37018286
ABSTRACT
Land development intensity is a comprehensive indicator to measure the degree of saving and intensive land construction and economic production activities. It is also the result of the joint action of natural, social, economic, and ecological elements in land development and utilization. Scientific prediction of land development intensity has particular reference significance for future regional development planning and the formulation of reasonable land use policies. Based on the inter-provincial land development intensity and its influencing factors in China, this study applied four algorithms, XGBoost, random forest model, support vector machine, and decision tree, to simulate and predict the land development intensity, and then compared the prediction accuracy of the four algorithms, and also carried out hyperparameter adjustment and prediction accuracy verification. The results show that the model with the best prediction performance among the four algorithms is XGBoost, and its R2 and MSE between predicted and valid values are 95.66% and 0.16, respectively, which are higher than the other three models. During the training process, the learning curve of the XGBoost model exhibited low fluctuation and fast fitting. Hyperparameter tuning is crucial to exploit the model's potential. The XGBoost model has the best prediction performance with the best hyperparameter combination of max_depth19, learning_rate 0.47, and n_estimatiors84. This study provides some reference significance for the simulation of land development and utilization dynamics.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Aprendizado de Máquina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Aprendizado de Máquina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article