Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of seven prehospital early warning scores to predict long-term mortality: a prospective, multicenter, ambulance-based study.
Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco; Enriquez de Salamanca Gambara, Rodrigo; Sanz-García, Ancor; Castro Villamor, Miguel A; Del Pozo Vegas, Carlos; Sánchez Soberón, Irene; Delgado Benito, Juan F; Martín-Conty, José L; López-Izquierdo, Raúl.
Afiliação
  • Martín-Rodríguez F; Advanced Clinical Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid.
  • Enriquez de Salamanca Gambara R; Advanced Life Support, Emergency Medical Services (SACYL).
  • Sanz-García A; Prehospital Early Warning Scoring-System Investigation Group.
  • Castro Villamor MA; Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid.
  • Del Pozo Vegas C; Prehospital Early Warning Scoring-System Investigation Group.
  • Sánchez Soberón I; Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, Talavera de la Reina.
  • Delgado Benito JF; Advanced Clinical Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid.
  • Martín-Conty JL; Prehospital Early Warning Scoring-System Investigation Group.
  • López-Izquierdo R; Advanced Clinical Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 30(3): 193-201, 2023 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37040664
ABSTRACT

METHODS:

A prospective, multicenter, ambulance-based study of adult patients with an acute illness involving six advanced life support units and 38 basic life support units, referring to five emergency departments in Spain.

RESULTS:

The primary outcome was long-term mortality with a 1-year follow-up. The compared scores included National Early Warning Score 2, VitalPAC early warning score, modified rapid emergency medicine score (MREMS), Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage Score, Rapid Acute Physiology Score, and Triage Early Warning Score. Discriminative power [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)] and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to compare the scores. Additionally, a Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used. Between 8 October 2019, and 31 July 2021, a total of 2674 patients were selected. The MREMS presented the highest AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.79), significantly higher than those of the other EWS. It also exhibited the best performance in the DCA and the highest hazard ratio for 1-year mortality [3.56 (2.94-4.31) for MREMS between 9 and 18 points, and 11.71 (7.21-19.02) for MREMS > 18].

CONCLUSION:

Among seven tested EWS, the use of the MREMS presented better characteristics to predict 1-year mortality; however, all these scores present moderate performances.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escore de Alerta Precoce Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Emerg Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escore de Alerta Precoce Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Emerg Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article