Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developing an artificial intelligence-based headache diagnostic model and its utility for non-specialists' diagnostic accuracy.
Katsuki, Masahito; Shimazu, Tomokazu; Kikui, Shoji; Danno, Daisuke; Miyahara, Junichi; Takeshima, Ryusaku; Takeshima, Eriko; Shimazu, Yuki; Nakashima, Takahiro; Matsuo, Mitsuhiro; Takeshima, Takao.
Afiliação
  • Katsuki M; Department of Neurosurgery, Itoigawa General Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
  • Shimazu T; Department of Neurology, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan.
  • Kikui S; Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Danno D; Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Miyahara J; Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Takeshima R; Department of Neurology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Takeshima E; Department of Plastic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Shimazu Y; Department of Clinical Training, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nakashima T; Department of Psychiatry, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan.
  • Matsuo M; Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
  • Takeshima T; Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Cephalalgia ; 43(5): 3331024231156925, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37072919
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Misdiagnoses of headache disorders are a serious issue. Therefore, we developed an artificial intelligence-based headache diagnosis model using a large questionnaire database in a specialized headache hospital.

METHODS:

Phase 1 We developed an artificial intelligence model based on a retrospective investigation of 4000 patients (2800 training and 1200 test dataset) diagnosed by headache specialists. Phase 2 The model's efficacy and accuracy were validated. Five non-headache specialists first diagnosed headaches in 50 patients, who were then re-diagnosed using AI. The ground truth was the diagnosis by headache specialists. The diagnostic performance and concordance rates between headache specialists and non-specialists with or without artificial intelligence were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Phase 1 The model's macro-average accuracy, sensitivity (recall), specificity, precision, and F values were 76.25%, 56.26%, 92.16%, 61.24%, and 56.88%, respectively, for the test dataset. Phase 2 Five non-specialists diagnosed headaches without artificial intelligence with 46% overall accuracy and 0.212 kappa for the ground truth. The statistically improved values with artificial intelligence were 83.20% and 0.678, respectively. Other diagnostic indexes were also improved.

CONCLUSIONS:

Artificial intelligence improved the non-specialist diagnostic performance. Given the model's limitations based on the data from a single center and the low diagnostic accuracy for secondary headaches, further data collection and validation are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Cefaleia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cephalalgia Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Cefaleia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cephalalgia Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article