Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nationwide survey on the current situation of quality control of diagnostic displays in Japan.
Yasuda, Tetsuya; Maeda, Kazuya; Ogoshi, Daisuke; Kanesaki, Masumi; Takano, Hiroaki; Nishikawa, Keiichi.
Afiliação
  • Yasuda T; Medical Imaging System Division, Japan Medical Imaging and Radiological Systems Industries Association, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. tetsuya.yasuda@eizo.com.
  • Maeda K; Healthcare Products Research and Development Department, EIZO Corporation, Hakusan, Ishikawa, Japan. tetsuya.yasuda@eizo.com.
  • Ogoshi D; Medical Imaging System Division, Japan Medical Imaging and Radiological Systems Industries Association, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kanesaki M; Sales Engineering Department, EIZO Corporation, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Takano H; Medical Imaging System Division, Japan Medical Imaging and Radiological Systems Industries Association, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nishikawa K; Healthcare Business Operation, JVCKENWOOD Corporation, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Radiol Phys Technol ; 16(2): 325-337, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37097551
The Japan Association of Radiological Technologists (JART) and the Japan Medical Imaging and Radiological Systems Industries Association jointly conducted a nationwide survey to reveal the current situation of diagnostic displays in Japan using a questionnaire on the performance and quality control (QC) of diagnostic displays for mammography and common use. The questionnaire for radiological technologists (RTs) was distributed via email to 4519 medical facilities throughout Japan, where RTs affiliated with JART were employed; 613 (13.6%) facilities responded. Diagnostic displays with suitable maximal luminance (500 cd/m2 or higher for mammography and 350 cd/m2 or higher for common use) and resolution (5 megapixels for mammography) have been widely used. However, while 99% of the facilities recognized the necessity of QC, only approximately 60% implemented it. This situation arose due to several barriers to QC implementation, such as insufficient devices, time, staff, knowledge, and the recognition of QC as a duty. The implementation of QC can lead to the avoidance of incidents or accidents caused by a decrease in luminance, variation in luminance response, and the influence of ambient light. Moreover, the barriers discouraging the implementation of QC are mainly related to a lack of human resources and budgets. Therefore, to popularize the QC of diagnostic displays in all facilities, it is crucial to identify countermeasures to eliminate these barriers and to continue positive actions for popularization.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Mamografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Radiol Phys Technol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Mamografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Radiol Phys Technol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article