Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attitudes of University Students towards Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policies: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Rome, Italy.
Sciurti, Antonio; Baccolini, Valentina; Renzi, Erika; De Blasiis, Maria Roberta; Siena, Leonardo Maria; Isonne, Claudia; Migliara, Giuseppe; Massimi, Azzurra; De Vito, Corrado; Marzuillo, Carolina; Villari, Paolo.
Afiliação
  • Sciurti A; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Baccolini V; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Renzi E; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • De Blasiis MR; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Siena LM; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Isonne C; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Migliara G; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Massimi A; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • De Vito C; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Marzuillo C; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Villari P; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(4)2023 Mar 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37112633
ABSTRACT
Mandatory vaccination (MV) against COVID-19 is a contentious topic. In this study, we used logistic regression models to identify attitudes among Sapienza University students towards MV for COVID-19. We considered three different scenarios mandatory COVID-19 vaccination (MCV) for healthcare workers (HCWs) (Model 1), for all people aged ≥ 12 years (Model 2), and for admission to schools and universities (Model 3). We collected 5287 questionnaires over a six-month period and divided these into three groups (September-October 2021, November-December 2021, and January-February 2022). MCV for HCWs was the most strongly supported policy (69.8% in favour), followed by MCV for admission to schools and universities (58.3%), and MCV for the general population (54.6%). In a multivariable analysis, the models showed both similarities and differences. There was no association of socio-demographic characteristics with the outcomes, apart from being enrolled in non-healthcare courses, which negatively affected Models 2 and 3. A greater COVID-19 risk perception was generally associated with a more positive attitude towards MCV, although heterogeneously across models. Vaccination status was a predictor of being in favour of MCV for HCWs, whereas being surveyed in November-February 2022 favoured MCV for admission to schools and universities. Attitudes towards MCV were variable across policies; thus, to avoid unintended consequences, these aspects should be carefully considered by policymakers.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Vaccines (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Vaccines (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article