Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Instruments to Assess Cognitive Reserve Among Older Adults: a Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.
Wei, Wanrui; Wang, Kairong; Shi, Jiyuan; Li, Zheng.
Afiliação
  • Wei W; School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba Da Chu Road, Shijingshan District, 100144, Beijing, China.
  • Wang K; School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba Da Chu Road, Shijingshan District, 100144, Beijing, China.
  • Shi J; School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba Da Chu Road, Shijingshan District, 100144, Beijing, China.
  • Li Z; School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba Da Chu Road, Shijingshan District, 100144, Beijing, China. zhengli@pumc.edu.cn.
Neuropsychol Rev ; 2023 Apr 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37115436
ABSTRACT
Cognitive reserve explains the differences in the susceptibility to cognitive impairment related to brain aging, pathology, or insult. Given that cognitive reserve has important implications for the cognitive health of typically and pathologically aging older adults, research needs to identify valid and reliable instruments for measuring cognitive reserve. However, the measurement properties of current cognitive reserve instruments used in older adults have not been evaluated according to the most up-to-date COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). This systematic review aimed to critically appraise, compare, and summarize the quality of the measurement properties of all existing cognitive reserve instruments for older adults. A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant studies published up to December 2021, which was conducted by three of four researchers using 13 electronic databases and snowballing method. The COSMIN was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies and the quality of measurement properties. Out of the 11,338 retrieved studies, only seven studies that concerned five instruments were eventually included. The methodological quality of one-fourth of the included studies was doubtful and three-seventh was very good, while only four measurement properties from two instruments were supported by high-quality evidence. Overall, current studies and evidence for selecting cognitive reserve instruments suitable for older adults were insufficient. All included instruments have the potential to be recommended, while none of the identified cognitive reserve instruments for older adults appears to be generally superior to the others. Therefore, further studies are recommended to validate the measurement properties of existing cognitive reserve instruments for older adults, especially the content validity as guided by COSMIN.Systematic Review Registration numbers CRD42022309399 (PROSPERO).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Neuropsychol Rev Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Neuropsychol Rev Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article