Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of Ureteral Injury During Colorectal Surgery Using Machine Learning.
Chen, Kevin A; Joisa, Chinmaya U; Stem, Jonathan M; Guillem, Jose G; Gomez, Shawn M; Kapadia, Muneera R.
Afiliação
  • Chen KA; Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Joisa CU; Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Stem JM; Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Guillem JG; Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Gomez SM; Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Kapadia MR; Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Am Surg ; 89(12): 5702-5710, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37133432
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ureteral injury (UI) is a rare but devastating complication during colorectal surgery. Ureteral stents may reduce UI but carry risks themselves. Risk predictors for UI could help target the use of stents, but previous efforts have relied on logistic regression (LR), shown moderate accuracy, and used intraoperative variables. We sought to use an emerging approach in predictive analytics, machine learning, to create a model for UI.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent colorectal surgery were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were split into training, validation, and test sets. The primary outcome was UI. Three machine learning approaches were tested including random forest (RF), gradient boosting (XGB), and neural networks (NN), and compared with traditional LR. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUROC).

RESULTS:

The data set included 262,923 patients, of whom 1519 (.578%) experienced UI. Of the modeling techniques, XGB performed the best, with an AUROC score of .774 (95% CI .742-.807) compared with .698 (95% CI .664-.733) for LR. Random forest and NN performed similarly with scores of .738 and .763, respectively. Type of procedure, work RVUs, indication for surgery, and mechanical bowel prep showed the strongest influence on model predictions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Machine learning-based models significantly outperformed LR and previous models and showed high accuracy in predicting UI during colorectal surgery. With proper validation, they could be used to support decision making regarding the placement of ureteral stents preoperatively.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Cirurgia Colorretal / Traumatismos Abdominais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Cirurgia Colorretal / Traumatismos Abdominais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article