Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility analysis of a novel non-invasive ultrasonographic method for the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in the intensive care unit.
See, Kay Choong; Tayebi, Salar; Sum, Chew Lai; Phua, Jason; Stiens, Johan; Wise, Robert; Mukhopadhyay, Amartya; Malbrain, Manu L N G.
Afiliação
  • See KC; Division of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 10, 119228, Singapore. kaychoongsee@nus.edu.sg.
  • Tayebi S; Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, BE-1050, Belgium.
  • Sum CL; Alexandra Hospital, 378 Alexandra Road, Singapore.
  • Phua J; Division of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 10, 119228, Singapore.
  • Stiens J; Alexandra Hospital, 378 Alexandra Road, Singapore.
  • Wise R; Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, BE-1050, Belgium.
  • Mukhopadhyay A; Adult Intensive Care, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
  • Malbrain MLNG; Discipline of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 37(5): 1351-1359, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37133628
Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is an important vital sign in critically ill patients and has a negative impact on morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to validate a novel non-invasive ultrasonographic approach to IAP measurement against the gold standard intra-bladder pressure (IBP) method. We conducted a prospective observational study in an adult medical ICU of a university hospital. IAP measurements using ultrasonography by two independent operators, with different experience levels (experienced, IAPUS1; inexperienced, IAPUS2), were compared with the gold standard IBP method performed by a third blinded operator. For the ultrasonographic method, decremental external pressure was applied on the anterior abdominal wall using a bottle filled with decreasing volumes of water. Ultrasonography looked at peritoneal rebound upon brisk withdrawal of the external pressure. The loss of peritoneal rebound was identified as the point where IAP was equal to or above the applied external pressure. Twenty-one patients underwent 74 IAP readings (range 2-15 mmHg). The number of readings per patient was 3.5 ± 2.5, and the abdominal wall thickness was 24.6 ± 13.1 mm. Bland and Altman's analysis showed a bias (0.39 and 0.61 mmHg) and precision (1.38 and 1.51 mmHg) for the comparison of IAPUS1 and IAPUS2 and vs. IBP, respectively with small limits of agreement that were in line with the research guidelines of the Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS). Our novel ultrasound-based IAP method displayed good correlation and agreement between IAP and IBP at levels up to 15 mmHg and is an excellent solution for quick decision-making in critically ill patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Terminal / Cavidade Abdominal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Monit Comput Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Terminal / Cavidade Abdominal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Monit Comput Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article