[Effects of remimazolam versus propofol on postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy].

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the effects of remimazolam versus propofol on postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy. Methods: A total of 108 elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy under general anesthesia in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May to October 2022 were prospectively included. The participants were divided into two groups by the random number table method: remimazolam group (R group, n=54) and propofol group (P group, n=54). There were 54 cases in the R group, with 35males and 19 females, and aged (65.4±3.1) years. Meanwhile, there were 54 cases in the P group, with 33males and 21 females, and aged (64.5±3.0) years. Anesthesia was induced as follows remimazolam 0.2-0.3 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5-1.0 µg/kg were intravenously injected in R group, while propofol 1-2 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5-1.0 µg/kg were intravenously injected in P group. Subsequently, anesthesia was maintained as follows remimazolam 0.4-1.0 mg·kg-1·h-1 and remifentanil 0.05-0.2 µg·kg-1·min-1 were intravenously infused in group R, while propofol 4-10 mg·kg-1·h-1 and remifentanil 0.05-0.2 µg·kg-1·min-1 were intravenously infused in group P. Bispectral index (BIS) was maintained at 45-60 during operation. The main outcome measures were the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scores 1 day before surgery, 1 day and 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) recorded 5 min before anesthesia induction (T0), 1 min after induction (T1), 1 min after endotracheal intubation (T2), immediately after skin incision (T3) and tracheal extubation (T4). The incidence of bradycardia and hypotension and the frequency of application of vasoactive drugs during anesthesia were recorded. Restlessness score (RS) and Ramsay sedation scale during the awakening period were recorded. Emergence time, tracheal extubation time, duration of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and postoperative length of hospital stay were recorded. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection and other complications were also recorded. Results: The QoR-15 scale scores [M (Q1, Q3)] of R group 1 day and 3 days after surgery were 114.0 (109.0, 118.3) and 131.0 (127.8, 133.0), which were higher than those of P group [106.0 (101.0, 112.0) and 127.0 (125.0, 129.3)] (both P<0.001). The incidence of bradycardia, hypotension and the frequency of application of vasoactive drugs of R group during anesthesia were 5.6% (3/54), 35.2% (19/54) and 27.8% (15/54), which were lower than those in P group [33.3% (18/54), 63.0% (34/54) and 55.6% (30/54), respectively] (all P<0.05). RS score during the awakening period in R group was 0.9±0.5, which was lower than that of P group (1.1±0.6) (P=0.046). Emergence time, tracheal extubation time and postoperative length of hospital stay of R group were (15.4±4.9) min, (16.6±4.7) min and (11.6±1.4) d, which were shorter than those of P group [(26.2±6.4) min, (27.8±5.8) min and (12.6±1.3) d] (all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in Ramsay scores during the awakening period, duration of PACU stay and the incidence of postoperative complications (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Both remimazolam and propofol can achieve satisfactory postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy. Remimazolam has more stable hemodynamics and lower incidence of adverse reactions.