Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of refractive error among Dongarias and use of Folding Phoropter (FoFo) as a field device enabling implementation research in this indigenous community. Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) Report # 13.
Padhy, Debananda; Das, Taraprasad; Majhi, Debasmita; Khanna, Rohit C; Avhad, Komal; Ota, Akhila Bihari; Rout, Prachi Parimita; Rath, Suryasnata.
Afiliação
  • Padhy D; Indian Oil Centre for Rural Eye Health, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Das T; Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eyecare, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
  • Majhi D; Indian Oil Centre for Rural Eye Health, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Khanna RC; Anant Bajaj Retina Institute- Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Centre for Vitreoretinal Disease, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India.
  • Avhad K; Indian Oil Centre for Rural Eye Health, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Ota AB; Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus, and Neuro-Ophthalmology, Child Sight Institute, Miriam Hyman Children's Eye Care Centre, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Rout PP; Allen Foster Community Eye Health Research Centre, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye care, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
  • Rath S; Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0284790, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37167346
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the prevalence of uncorrected refractive error (URE) among Dongarias-a particularly vulnerable tribal group in Rayagada, Odisha, India and evaluate if folding phoropter (FoFo) can help achieve on-site correction of URE.

METHODS:

This was a cross-sectional study. FoFo was used for people with URE. Spherical equivalent (SE) spectacles based on the FoFo refraction were dispensed when distance visual acuity improved to > 6/12. Others were referred to fixed eye centres. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the relationship of URE with sociodemographic characters and factors predicting acceptance of FoFo.

RESULTS:

In the study, 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]7-8) people had URE, and included 4% with severe vision impairment and 36% with moderate visual impairment. URE was less common in children. Simple hyperopia was more common in females (25.3% vs 19.3%); compound myopic astigmatism was more common in males (27.4% vs 20.2%). People older than 50 years (p <0.0001) and females (p <0.0001) were more likely to have URE. Ninety-four people accepted FoFo on-site refraction and received SE spectacles; the acceptance was better in the younger (15-29 years old) and literate people (p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

URE was the second most common cause of visual impairment in older adults and was higher in females. Within its technological limit, FoFo could be used in the field for correcting URE and obviating the need for travel, thus bridging the know-do gap for the marginalised Dongaria community.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article