Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intensive care unit admission is not necessary after venous sinus stenting.
Iyer, Ankitha M; Midtlien, Jackson P; Kittel, Carol; Fargen, Kyle M.
Afiliação
  • Iyer AM; Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA aiyer@wakehealth.edu.
  • Midtlien JP; Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Kittel C; Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Fargen KM; Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 16(3): 313-317, 2024 Feb 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37197930
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Many physicians routinely admit patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) for close monitoring, but little data exists on whether this is necessary.

METHODS:

Electronic medical records of consecutive patients who underwent VSS by the senior author from 2016 to 2022 at a single center were reviewed.

RESULTS:

214 patients were included. The mean (SD) age was 35.5 (11.6) and 196 (91.6%) patients were female. A total of 166 (77.6%) patients underwent transverse sinus stenting alone; 9 (4.2%) underwent superior sagittal sinus (SSS) stenting alone, 37 (17.3) concomitant transverse and SSS stenting, and 2 (0.9%) underwent stenting at alternate sites. All patients were planned admission to the regular ward (27.6%) or day hospital (72.4%). Twenty (9.3%) patients were discharged to home the same day as the procedure and 182 (85%) patients were discharged the following day. Major periprocedural complications were identified in 2 (0.93%) patients and minor complications were identified in 16 (7.4%). Only one patient with a subdural hematoma identified in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) had care escalated to the ICU. No severe complications were identified after the PACU stay. During the next 48 hours after discharge, 4 (1.9%) patients returned to any emergency room to be evaluated without requiring readmission.

CONCLUSION:

Routine ICU admission following uncomplicated VSS is unnecessary. Overnight admission to a low-acuity ward, or even same-day discharge in select patients, appears to be a safe and cost-effective strategy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pseudotumor Cerebral / Seios Transversos Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Neurointerv Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pseudotumor Cerebral / Seios Transversos Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Neurointerv Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article