Validation of a Monte Carlo simulated cardiac phantom for planar and SPECT studies.

PURPOSE: This work aimed to validate Monte Carlo (MC) simulated cardiac phantoms for the evaluation of planar- and SPECT-gated-blood-pool (GBP-P and GBP-S) studies. METHODS: A comparison of gamma camera system performance criteria measurements (energy resolution, spatial resolution, sensitivity) with MC simulations was conducted. Furthermore, the accuracy of measured and simulated volumes of two stereolithography-printed cardiac phantoms (based on 4D-XCAT phantoms) was assessed. Finally, the simulated GBP-P and GBP-S XCAT studies were validated by comparing calculated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ventricle volume values with known parameters. RESULTS: The simulated performance criteria compared well with measured values (energy resolution difference: 0.1 ± 0.10%; spatial resolution (full width at half maximum) difference ≤ 0.5 ± 0.8 mm and system sensitivity difference ≤ 6.2 ± 0.62cps/MBq). The measured and simulated cardiac phantoms were in good agreement; the left anterior oblique views compared well. This is supported by line profiles through these phantoms and on average, simulated counts were 5.8% lower than measured counts. The LVEF values calculated from the GBP-P and GBP-S simulated data differ from known values (2.8 ± 0.64% and 0.8 ± 0.52%). The differences between the known XCAT LV volumes and simulated GBP-S calculated volumes were -1.2 ± 1.91 ml and -1.5 ± 0.96 ml for the end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. CONCLUSION: The MC-simulated cardiac phantom has been validated successfully. Stereolithography-printing allows researchers to create clinically realistic organ phantoms and is a valuable tool for validating MC simulations and clinical software. By conducting GBP simulation studies with various XCAT models, the user will be able to generate GBP-P and GBP-S databases for future software evaluation.