Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Declining Use of Prone Positioning After High Initial Uptake in COVID-19 Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Hochberg, Chad H; Psoter, Kevin J; Eakin, Michelle N; Hager, David N.
Afiliação
  • Hochberg CH; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  • Psoter KJ; Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  • Eakin MN; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  • Hager DN; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Crit Care Med ; 51(11): 1547-1551, 2023 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37294144
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Prone positioning for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has historically been underused, but was widely adopted for COVID-19-associated ARDS early in the pandemic. Whether this successful implementation has been sustained over the first 3 years of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. In this study, we characterized proning use in patients with COVID-19 ARDS from March 2020 to December 2022.

DESIGN:

Multicenter retrospective observational study.

SETTING:

Five-hospital health system in Maryland, USA. PATIENTS Adults with COVID-19 supported with invasive mechanical ventilation and with a P ao2 /F io2 ratio of less than or equal to 150 mm Hg while receiving F io2 of greater than or equal to 0.6 within 72 hours of intubation.

INTERVENTIONS:

None. MEASUREMENTS We extracted demographic, clinical, and positioning data from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the initiation of proning within 48 hours of meeting criteria. We compared proning use by year with univariate and multivariate relative risk (RR) regression. Additionally, we evaluated the association of treatment during a COVID-19 surge period and receipt of prone positioning. MAIN

RESULTS:

We identified 656 qualifying patients; 341 from 2020, 224 from 2021, and 91 from 2022. More than half (53%) met severe ARDS criteria. Early proning occurred in 56.2% of patients in 2020, 56.7% in 2021, and 27.5% in 2022. This translated to a 51% reduction in use of prone positioning among patients treated in 2022 versus 2020 (RR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33-0.72; p < 0.001). This reduction remained significant in adjusted models (adjusted RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.82; p = 0.002). Treatment during COVID-19 surge periods was associated with a 7% increase in proning use (adjusted RR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of prone positioning for COVID-19 ARDS is declining. Interventions to increase and sustain appropriate use of this evidence-based therapy are warranted.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article