Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Occipital Nerves Applied Strain Test to Support Occipital Neuralgia Diagnosis.
Samolsky Dekel, Boaz G; Sorella, Maria C; Vasarri, Alessio; Melotti, Rita M.
Afiliação
  • Samolsky Dekel BG; Department of Medicine and Surgery Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti N. 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. boaz.samolskydekel@unibo.it.
  • Sorella MC; Anesthesia and Pain Therapy Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti N. 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. boaz.samolskydekel@unibo.it.
  • Vasarri A; Post Graduate School of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti N. 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. boaz.samolskydekel@unibo.it.
  • Melotti RM; Department of Medicine and Surgery Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti N. 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Pain Ther ; 12(5): 1135-1148, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37310572
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Occipital neuralgia (ON) is a disabling cephalalgia form with demanding diagnostic workflow. We report the description and reliability analyses of the occipital nerves-applied strain (ONAS) test for occipital neuralgia (ON) early-stage diagnosis in cephalalgia patients.

METHODS:

In a retrospective and observational study, we evaluated, among n = 163 consecutive cephalalgia patients, the sensitivity, specificity, and prior probability [positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values] of the ONAS test against two reference tests (occipital nerve anesthetic block and the painDETECT questionnaire). Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) and χ2 analyses verified the ONAS test outcome's dependence upon independent variables (gender, age, pain site, block test, and painDETECT outcomes). We assessed inter-rater agreement with Cohen's kappa statistic.

RESULTS:

ONAS test showed sensitivity and specificity of 81 and 18%, respectively, against the painDETECT and of 94 and 46%, respectively, against the block test. PPV was > 70% against both tests, while NPV was 81% against the block test and 26% against the painDETECT. Interrater agreement Cohen's kappa was excellent. Significant association (χ2 analyses) and relationship (MLR) were found only between ONAS test and pain site but not with the other independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS:

The ONAS test showed satisfactory reliability among cephalalgia patients; thus, it might be considered a valuable early stage tool for ON diagnosis in these patients.
We report the description and reliability features of an occipital neuralgia diagnostic tool. The latter is based on the assertion that applying a strain on putatively compromised occipital nerves prompts abnormal nerve discharges and subjective pain reactions and thus may reveal occipital neuralgia. Among 163 cephalalgia patients, the test showed sensitivity and specificity of 81 and 18%, respectively, against the painDETECT questionnaire and 94 and 46%, respectively, against the occipital nerves' block test. Interrater agreement was excellent, and significant associations and relationships were found only between the tool and congruent pain site but not with the other independent predictors. This tool may help clinicians' early detection of occipital neuralgia in cephalalgia patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ther Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ther Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article