Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of general anaesthesia on breast cancer survival: a 5-year follow up of a pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial, the CAN-study, comparing propofol and sevoflurane.
Enlund, Mats; Berglund, Anders; Enlund, Anna; Lundberg, Johan; Wärnberg, Fredrik; Wang, Dong-Xin; Ekman, Andreas; Ahlstrand, Rebecca; Flisberg, Per; Hedlund, Lars; Östlund, Ingrid; Bergkvist, Leif.
Afiliação
  • Enlund M; Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Berglund A; Epistat AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Enlund A; Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Lundberg J; Department of Perioperative and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Wärnberg F; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Wang DX; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Ekman A; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Ahlstrand R; Department of Anaesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Flisberg P; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Kalmar Hospital, Kalmar, Sweden.
  • Hedlund L; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Östlund I; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.
  • Bergkvist L; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skellefteå Hospital, Sweden.
EClinicalMedicine ; 60: 102037, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37333664
ABSTRACT

Background:

Anaesthesia may impact long-term cancer survival. In the Cancer and Anaesthesia study, we hypothesised that the hypnotic drug propofol will have an advantage of at least five percentage points in five-year survival over the inhalational anaesthetic sevoflurane for breast cancer surgery.

Methods:

From 2118 eligible breast cancer patients scheduled for primary curable, invasive breast cancer surgery, 1764 were recruited after ethical approval and individual informed consent to this open label, single-blind, randomised trial at four county- and three university hospitals in Sweden and one Chinese university hospital. Of surveyed patients, 354 were excluded, mainly due to refusal to participate. Patients were randomised by computer at the monitoring organisation to general anaesthesia maintenance with either intravenous propofol or inhaled sevoflurane in a 11 ratio in permuted blocks. Data related to anaesthesia, surgery, oncology, and demographics were registered. The primary endpoint was five-year overall survival. Data are presented as Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Hazard Ratios based on Cox univariable regression analyses by both intention-to-treat and per-protocol. EudraCT, 2013-002380-25 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01975064.

Findings:

Of 1764 patients, included from December 3, 2013, to September 29, 2017, 1670 remained for analysis. The numbers who survived at least five years were 773/841 (91.9% (95% CI 90.1-93.8)) in the propofol group and 764/829 (92.2% (90.3-94.0)) in the sevoflurane group, (HR 1.03 (0.73-1.44); P = 0.875); the corresponding results in the per-protocol-analysis were 733/798 (91.9% (90.0-93.8)) and 653/710 (92.0% (90.0-94.0)) (HR = 1.01 (0.71-1.44); P = 0.955). Survival after a median follow-up of 76.7 months did not indicate any difference between the groups (HR 0.97, 0.72-1.29; P = 0.829, log rank test).

Interpretation:

No difference in overall survival was found between general anaesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane for breast cancer surgery.

Funding:

Swedish Research Council; Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council; Västmanland Regional Research Fund; Västmanland Cancer Foundation; Stig and Ragna Gohrton Foundation; Birgit and Henry Knutsson Foundation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspecto: Ethics Idioma: En Revista: EClinicalMedicine Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspecto: Ethics Idioma: En Revista: EClinicalMedicine Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article