Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Chang, Yu; Huang, Yun-Ting; Chi, Kuan-Yu; Huang, Yen-Ta.
Afiliação
  • Chang Y; Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Huang YT; Department of Anesthesiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Chi KY; Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Huang YT; Department of Education, Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
PeerJ ; 11: e15495, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37334113
Background: To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam is a new short-acting GABA-A receptor agonist. It is an ester-based benzodiazepine. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for procedure sedation. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy or safety of remimazolam versus propofol. Meta-analysis were conducted using RStudio with "metafor" package with random-effects model. Results: A total of twelve RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with remimazolam for procedural sedation had lower risk of bradycardia (OR 0.28, 95% CI [0.14-0.57]), hypotension (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.22-0.32]), and respiratory depression (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.14-0.36]). There was no difference in the risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.15-2.79]) and dizziness (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.53-1.61]) between the remimazolam and propofol groups. Using remimazolam for procedural sedation is significantly associated with less injection pain compared to propofol (OR 0.06, 95% CI [0.03-0.13]). Regarding the sedation efficacy, there was no difference in sedation success rate or time to loss of consciousness, recover and discharge between the remimazolam and the propofol groups. Conclusions: Based on our meta-analysis, patients receiving procedural sedation with remimazolam had lower risk of bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression and injection pain compared with propofol. On the other hand, there was no difference in sedation success rate, risk of PONV, dizziness, time to LOC, recovery and discharge between these two sedatives. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022362950.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Insuficiência Respiratória / Propofol / Hipotensão / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Insuficiência Respiratória / Propofol / Hipotensão / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article