Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments.
Stahl, Bernd Carsten; Antoniou, Josephina; Bhalla, Nitika; Brooks, Laurence; Jansen, Philip; Lindqvist, Blerta; Kirichenko, Alexey; Marchal, Samuel; Rodrigues, Rowena; Santiago, Nicole; Warso, Zuzanna; Wright, David.
Afiliação
  • Stahl BC; School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Antoniou J; Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
  • Bhalla N; School of Sciences, University of Central Lancashire Cyprus, Larnaka, Cyprus.
  • Brooks L; Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
  • Jansen P; Information School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Lindqvist B; Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Kirichenko A; Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  • Marchal S; WithSecure, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Rodrigues R; WithSecure, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Santiago N; Trilateral Research, London, UK.
  • Warso Z; Trilateral Research, London, UK.
  • Wright D; Technology Ethics and Policy Consulting, Kansas City, USA.
Artif Intell Rev ; : 1-33, 2023 Mar 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37362899
ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence (AI) is producing highly beneficial impacts in many domains, from transport to healthcare, from energy distribution to marketing, but it also raises concerns about undesirable ethical and social consequences. AI impact assessments (AI-IAs) are a way of identifying positive and negative impacts early on to safeguard AI's benefits and avoid its downsides. This article describes the first systematic review of these AI-IAs. Working with a population of 181 documents, the authors identified 38 actual AI-IAs and subjected them to a rigorous qualitative analysis with regard to their purpose, scope, organisational context, expected issues, timeframe, process and methods, transparency and challenges. The review demonstrates some convergence between AI-IAs. It also shows that the field is not yet at the point of full agreement on content, structure and implementation. The article suggests that AI-IAs are best understood as means to stimulate reflection and discussion concerning the social and ethical consequences of AI ecosystems. Based on the analysis of existing AI-IAs, the authors describe a baseline process of implementing AI-IAs that can be implemented by AI developers and vendors and that can be used as a critical yardstick by regulators and external observers to evaluate organisations' approaches to AI.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Ethics Idioma: En Revista: Artif Intell Rev Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Ethics Idioma: En Revista: Artif Intell Rev Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article