Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is vaccine response to SARS-CoV-2 preserved after switching to anti-CD20 therapies in patients with multiple sclerosis or related disorders?
Jeantin, Lina; Abdi, Basma; Soulié, Cathia; Sterlin, Delphine; Maillart, Elisabeth; Beigneux, Ysoline; Hippolyte, Amandine; Belin, Lisa; Marcelin, Anne-Geneviève; Pourcher, Valérie; Louapre, Céline.
Afiliação
  • Jeantin L; Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
  • Abdi B; Sorbonne University, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, laboratoty of virology, Paris, France.
  • Soulié C; Sorbonne University, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, laboratoty of virology, Paris, France.
  • Sterlin D; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI-Paris), Département d'Immunologie, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
  • Maillart E; Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
  • Beigneux Y; Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
  • Hippolyte A; Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Inserm, CNRS, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, CIC neurosciences, Paris, France.
  • Belin L; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Clinique Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France.
  • Marcelin AG; Sorbonne University, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, laboratoty of virology, Paris, France.
  • Pourcher V; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Maladies infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris, France.
  • Louapre C; Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France celine.louapre@aphp.fr.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 95(1): 19-28, 2023 Dec 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479463
BACKGROUND: Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is recommended prior to introducing anti-CD20 therapies, limited data are available regarding the evolution of post-vaccinal immunity. METHODS: This retrospective study compared anti-Spike antibody titres at 6 and 12 months from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination between patients vaccinated before switching to anti-CD20 ('Switch') and two control groups: (1) patients vaccinated under disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) other than fingolimod and anti-CD20 ('Other DMTs'); (2) patients vaccinated on anti-CD20 ('Anti-CD20'). Anti-Spike-specific T-cell responses were compared between 'Switch' and 'Anti-CD20' groups. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included in the 'Switch' group, 54 in the 'Other DMTs' group and 141 in the 'Anti-CD20' group. At 6 months, in the subset of patients who received a booster dose, the 'Switch' group had lower anti-Spike titres compared with the 'Other DMTs' group (median 241.0 IQR (88.0; 504.0) BAU/mL vs 2034 (1155; 4634) BAU/mL, p<0.001), and less patients in the 'Switch' group reached the protective threshold of 264 BAU/mL. The 'Switch' group had higher anti-Spike titres than the 'Anti-CD20' group (7.5 (0.0; 62.1) BAU/mL, p=0.001). Anti-Spike titres were not different between the 'Switch' and 'Other DMTs' groups before booster administration. These results were similar at 12 months. Spike-specific T-cell positivity was similar between the 'Switch' and 'Anti-CD20' groups at 6 and 12 months (60.4% vs 61.0%, p=0.53, and 79.4% vs 87.5%, p=0.31, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a primary vaccination performed before the first anti-CD20 cycle, our results suggest weaker immune responses at 6 and 12 months and decreased booster efficacy after introducing anti-CD20. Patients vaccinated prior to anti-CD20 introduction might falsely be considered as fully protected by vaccination.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinas / COVID-19 / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinas / COVID-19 / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article