Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cumulative Neutral Loss Model for Fragment Deconvolution in Electrospray Ionization High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Data.
van Herwerden, Denice; O'Brien, Jake W; Lege, Sascha; Pirok, Bob W J; Thomas, Kevin V; Samanipour, Saer.
Afiliação
  • van Herwerden D; Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1012 WX, The Netherlands.
  • O'Brien JW; Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1012 WX, The Netherlands.
  • Lege S; Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4102, Australia.
  • Pirok BWJ; Agilent Technologies Deutschland GmbH, Waldbronn 76337, Germany.
  • Thomas KV; Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1012 WX, The Netherlands.
  • Samanipour S; Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4102, Australia.
Anal Chem ; 95(33): 12247-12255, 2023 Aug 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549176
ABSTRACT
Clean high-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) are essential to a successful structural elucidation of an unknown feature during nontarget analysis (NTA) workflows. This is a crucial step, particularly for the spectra generated during data-independent acquisition or during direct infusion experiments. The most commonly available tools only take advantage of the time domain for spectral cleanup. Here, we present an algorithm that combines the time domain and mass domain information to perform spectral deconvolution. The algorithm employs a probability-based cumulative neutral loss (CNL) model for fragment deconvolution. The optimized model, with a mass tolerance of 0.005 Da and a scoreCNL threshold of 0.00, was able to achieve a true positive rate (TPr) of 95.0%, a false discovery rate (FDr) of 20.6%, and a reduction rate of 35.4%. Additionally, the CNL model was extensively tested on real samples containing predominantly pesticides at different concentration levels and with matrix effects. Overall, the model was able to obtain a TPr above 88.8% with FD rates between 33 and 79% and reduction rates between 9 and 45%. Finally, the CNL model was compared with the retention time difference method and peak shape correlation analysis, showing that a combination of correlation analysis and the CNL model was the most effective for fragment deconvolution, obtaining a TPr of 84.7%, an FDr of 54.4%, and a reduction rate of 51.0%.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Anal Chem Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Anal Chem Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article